arXiv AI September 24, 2026 By Tencent Hunyuan Team, Ao Liu, Botong Zhou, Can Xu, Chayse Zhou, ChenChen Zhang, Chengcheng Xu, Chenhao Wang, Decheng Wu, Dengpeng Wu, Dian Jiao, Dong Du, Dong Wang, Feng Zhang, Fengzong Lian, Guanghui Xu, Guanwei Zhang, Hai Wang, Haipeng Luo, Han Hu, Huilin Xu, Jiajia Wu, Jianchen Zhu, Jianfeng Yan, Jiaqi Zhu, Jihong Zhang, Jinbao Xue, Jun Xia, Junqiang Zheng, Kai Liu, Kai Zhang, Kai Zheng, Kejiao Li, Keyao Wang, Lan Jiang, Lixin Liu, Lulu Wu, Mengyuan Huang, Peijie Yu, Peiqi Wang, Qian Wang, Qianbiao Xiang, Qibin Liu, Qingfeng Sun, Richard Guo, Ruobing Xie, Saiyong Yang, Shaohua Chen, Shihui Hu, Shuai Li, Shuaipeng Li, Shuang Chen, Suncong Zheng, Tao Yang, Tian Zhang, Tinghao Yu, Weidong Han, Weijie Liu, Weijin Zhou, Weikang Wang, Wesleye Chen, Xiao Feng, Xiaoqin Ren, Xingwu Sun, Xiong Kuang, Xuemeng Huang, Xun Cao, Yanfeng Chen, Yang Du, Zhen Yang, Yangyu Tao, Yaping Deng, Yi Shen, Yigeng Hong, Yiqi Chen

Hunyuan-A13B Technical Report

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Sep 18

QVAC Genesis III: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Open Synthetic STEM Corpus for Efficient Language Model Pre-Training

QVAC Genesis III is a 191.43 B‑token synthetic STEM corpus covering 19 domains and multiple difficulty levels, created through a dual generation strategy that uses a weak edge‑scale student model to generate corrective explanations and contrastive reasoning. The authors evaluate the corpus with an LLM‑as‑a‑parser protocol and demonstrate that 1.7 B‑parameter models trained on QVAC Genesis III outperform those trained on Cosmopedia‑v2 and the Cosmo‑1B model on ARC, GPQA Diamond, and MMLU STEM benchmarks, achieving up to +28.57% improvement on ARC‑E and a 99.45% valid answer rate.

By Davide Vitabile, N. Ranjan, Akshay Nambiar, Kamal K. Gupta, Amril Nazir

llms efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 4

Aryabhata 2: Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Advanced STEM Reasoning

arXiv:2605. 28829v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Competitive STEM examinations such as JEE and NEET require multi-step symbolic reasoning, precise numerical computation, and deep conceptual understanding across physics, chemistry, and mathematics.

By Ritvik Rastogi, Vishal Singh, Tejas Chaudhari, Sandeep Varma

llms reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Sep 7

Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

The paper surveys efficient reasoning in large language models, contrasting fast intuitive (System 1) and slow deep (System 2) reasoning. It analyzes why System 2 is computationally costly yet more accurate, and why System 1 is efficient but less effective. The survey covers causes of inefficiency, patterns of reasoning behavior, and potential solutions to balance performance and computational budgets, offering actionable insights and an open‑source repository for ongoing research.

By Rui Wang, Hongru Wang, Boyang Xue, Jianhui Pang, Shudong Liu, Yi Chen, Jiahao Qiu, Derek Fai Wong, Heng Ji, Kam-Fai Wong

llms

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 2

HMPO: Hybrid Median-length Policy Optimization for Chain-of-Thought Compression

arXiv:2606. 01934v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models achieve remarkable performance via extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, yet this lengthy process incurs substantial inference overhead.

By Minghui Zheng, Hongxu Chen, Huimin Ren, Hongsheng Xin, Xiaoyang Qu, Ze Wang, Shuling Yang, Ziyu Peng, Kaike Zhang, Pan Zhou, Kun Zhan

llms reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Jun 26

NebulaExp-8B: An Empirical Post-Training Pipeline via Full-Scale Ablation Research

arXiv:2606. 26671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training alignment determines the reasoning and human preference following capabilities of large language models, yet most existing works withhold detailed data construction, filtering rules and training recipes, which hinders community reproducibility and lightweight model optimization.

By Qiaobo Hao, Yangqian Wu, Shunyi Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Ziqun Li, Yayin He, Muqing Li, Chen Zhong

llms reinforcement-learning fine-tuning efficiency benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Sep 15

Post-Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost

arXiv:2605.06165v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerates, token consumption from intermediate reasoning traces increasingly contribut...

By Richmond Sin Jing Xuan, Rishabh Bhardwaj, Soujanya Poria

llms efficiency benchmarks

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

QVAC Genesis III: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Open Synthetic STEM Corpus for Efficient Language Model Pre-Training

Aryabhata 2: Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Advanced STEM Reasoning

Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

HMPO: Hybrid Median-length Policy Optimization for Chain-of-Thought Compression

NebulaExp-8B: An Empirical Post-Training Pipeline via Full-Scale Ablation Research

Post-Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost