Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

28,620 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Omni Interaction Agent Technical Report

The technical report introduces Gander, an end‑to‑end model that integrates omni perception, real‑time interaction, and agentic capabilities into a single framework. Unlike traditional turn‑based systems, Gander continuously processes streaming inputs from video, speech, and text, enabling natural full‑duplex interaction in both everyday conversations and workflow‑oriented scenarios. Its architecture features a Cerebellum‑Brain collaboration—where the Cerebellum handles real‑time interaction and omni conversational tasks while the Brain manages complex reasoning—and a streaming Thinker‑Talker design that flattens inputs and outputs into an ordered token stream for low‑latency, continuous dialogue. Evaluations across conversational ability, omni understanding, interactive capability, and agentic intelligence show that Gander matches state‑of‑the‑art open‑source models in spoken dialogue while maintaining robust performance in noisy, multi‑party, and backchannel environments.

By Orantqing, Shengpeng Ji, Junlong Tong, Jialong Zuo, Dongjie Fu, Di Cao, Yangzhuo Li, Shangda Wu, Franz, Evan, Theron Veyra, Changhao Pan, Jingyu Lu, Dongchao Yang, Zhifei Xie, Yang Tan, Xiaoyu Shen, Xiaoda Yang, Wenfu Wang, Teddy Sun, Steve Yves, Zhou Zhao
arXiv AI
Sep 10

LayerRoute: Action-Conditioned Mixture-of-Layers Routing for Vision-Language-Action Policies

arXiv:2609.06079v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) to guide action generation for robot control. VLMs provide hier...

By Zheng Lu, Haoran Liao, Wanqi Zhong, Yunhe Ni, Lijie Wang, Xingjie Fan, Zhisheng Chen, Yantang Qu, Meijia Chen, Tianyu Xin, Zirui Song, Yiming Li
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Style Over Substance: Content-Invariant Wrappers Flip LLM Safety-Judge Verdicts

The paper investigates whether automatic safety judges evaluate the content of a model’s reply or merely its style. By keeping the reply content fixed and adding various style wrappers—such as educational disclaimers, fake reasoning blocks, or token refusals—the authors show that many judges flip their verdicts, indicating that style can influence safety judgments. The study evaluates over 600 jailbreak examples across multiple judges, revealing that some judges are highly susceptible to style-based manipulation while others remain robust.

By Yongxi Zhou, Wenbo Ye, Yuanzhe Liu, Zihan Dong, Junwei Yao
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 10

3rd Place Solution to Human Motion Challenges in Real-World and Clinical Settings (MoCha) @ECCV2026: Language-Aligned Motion Representations for Domain-Generalizable UPDRS-Gait Severity Estimation

arXiv:2609.10187v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work, we introduce language-aligned motion representations for domain-generalizable UPDRS-Gait severity estimation, aiming to learn semanticall...

By Soojie Kim, Muhammad Munsif, Minkyung Kim, Seungryul Baek
arXiv AI
Sep 10

EXAONE Finance 1.0: An Attention-free Time Series Foundation Model for Financial Time Series

arXiv:2609.04239v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This technical report presents EXAONE Forecast for Finance (EXAONE Finance), a financial time series foundation model (TSFM) tailored to financial...

By Seunghan Lee, Jaehoon Lee, Jun Seo, Tae Yoon Lim, Dongwan Kang, Hwanil Choi, Minjae Kim, Sungdong Yoo, Junhyeok Kang, Sangjun Han, Soonyoung Lee, Wonbin Ahn
arXiv AI
Sep 10

AdaExplore: Failure-Driven Adaptation and Diversity-Preserving Search for Efficient Kernel Generation

arXiv:2604.16625v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent large language model (LLM) agents have shown promise in using execution feedback for test-time adaptation. However, robust self-improv...

By Weihua Du, Jingming Zhuo, Yixin Dong, Andre Wang He, Weiwei Sun, Zeyu Zheng, Manupa Karunaratne, Ivan Fox, Tim Dettmers, Tianqi Chen, Yiming Yang, Sean Welleck
arXiv AI
Sep 10

FastE: Readout-Triggered Token Compression for LLM Embedding Inference

FastE is a training‑free, plug‑and‑play method that compresses token prefixes in large language model (LLM) embedding inference. It uses a shared fixed threshold on batch‑mean readout‑prefix alignment to decide when to compress and ranks prefix states by readout attention scores to keep the most important ones. Experiments on Qwen3‑Embedding models show that FastE can cut decoder‑backbone FLOPs by over 40% while preserving more than 99% of the original ranking quality across multiple benchmarks and tasks.

By Jinsong Shu, Jinyong Wen, Baokun Wang, Zhongle Xie, Lidan Shou, Weiqiang Wang, Gang Chen
arXiv AI
Sep 10

DGCPath: Distribution-Aware Generative Contrastive Framework for Self-supervised Path Representation Learning -- Extended Version

DGCPath is a Distribution‑Aware Generative Contrastive framework designed for self‑supervised path representation learning. It combines a diffusion‑based view generator, a variational contrastive mechanism that aligns latent features at the distribution level, and a generative cross‑supervision module for view‑level consistency. Experiments on three real‑world trajectory datasets show that DGCPath surpasses state‑of‑the‑art baselines on two downstream tasks, indicating stronger generalization and representation effectiveness.

By Sean Bin Yang, Hao Miao, Zongyi Xu, Jilin Hu, Xiangmeng Wang, Hua Lu, Bin Yang, Christian S. Jensen
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Human or Machine? A Preliminary Turing Test for Speech-to-Speech Interaction

The paper reports the first Turing test for speech‑to‑speech systems, gathering 2,968 human judgments on conversations between nine state‑of‑the‑art S2S systems and 28 humans. None of the evaluated systems passed the test, highlighting a clear gap in human‑likeness. The authors diagnose the failure with an 18‑dimension taxonomy, finding that paralinguistic cues, emotional expressivity, and conversational persona—not semantic understanding—are the main bottlenecks, and they propose an interpretable model for automatic human‑vs‑machine discrimination.

By Xiang Li, Jiabao Gao, Sipei Lin, Xuan Zhou, Chi Zhang, Bo Cheng, Jiale Han, Benyou Wang