Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

15,794 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Scores Are Not Decisions: Cost-Aware Stopping for Tool Acquisition in LLM Agents

arXiv:2607. 27083v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As LLM agents increasingly depend on diverse external services such as search engines, databases, and connectors, agent harnesses face a fundamental tool-selection challenge: acquiring too few tools leaves the task under-informed, while too many adds cost, context load, and privacy exposure.

By Yicheng Feng, Yan Zhang, Yan Cheng, Wei Qi
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Archetypes or ability? Clustering for modelling student mathematical competence

arXiv:2607. 26063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalised learning systems often assume that mathematical ability is combined of discrete abilities, acquired sequentially and dependent upon first acquiring foundational abilities, and students often report different strengths.

By Benjamin Mawdsley, Tom Quilter, Richard Turner, Sarah Jackson, Paul Edwards
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

HealthSLM-Bench: Benchmarking Small Language Models for Mobile and Wearable Healthcare Monitoring

arXiv:2509. 07260v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mobile and wearable healthcare monitoring play a vital role in facilitating timely interventions, managing chronic health conditions, and ultimately improving individuals' quality of life.

By Xin Wang, Ting Dang, Xinyu Zhang, Vassilis Kostakos, Michael J. Witbrock, Hong Jia
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Emergent Sparsity in Frozen Random CNN Feature Extractors for Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2607. 26059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We report a striking phenomenon: deep reinforcement learning agents trained with frozen, randomly initialized CNN feature extractors spontaneously develop extremely sparse fully-connected representations, without any sparsity-inducing objective.

By Scott M. Norton