Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed as personal assistants. Existing evaluations, however, mostly use short, self-contained requests in static environments.
I replayed the same 27 real production tasks through two local models, one hardware upgrade apart, to find out what it actually takes to replace Claude as the brain behind a 90-tool personal agent. The post Can a Local LLM Run My AI Assistant?
By Arsen Apostolov
Understanding both expressed and evoked emotions is critical for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to achieve comprehensive affect-aware interactions. However, existing benchmarks typically examine expressed and evoked emotions in isolation or are constrained to coarse-grained and incomplete affective characterizations.
Computer-using agents can perceive rich software interfaces, yet their decisions often lack visual procedural memory: they may recognize individual controls without identifying which familiar workflow is active, which control matters next, or what evidence would confirm progress. Raw interaction traces preserve such information but are long and noisy to condition on, whereas text-only skills often omit the visual state that makes a procedure applicable.
Large language model (LLM)-based search agents answer questions through multi-step interactions with external environments. However, providing complete execution trajectories to the LLM causes unbounded context growth and introduces noise.
Two instruments of EU digital law place inference at their centre and mean different things by it. Article 3(1) of the AI Act uses the capability to infer constitutively: it is the central feature separating the regulated category from conventional software.
Agent skills represent a standardized format for packaging procedural knowledge and domain expertise, serving within agent harness systems as an essential mechanism to continually constrain a language model's behavior space for repeatable, high-quality task execution. However, because strong closed-source models entail high inference costs, current popular agent harnesses, such as Codex and OpenClaw, remain prohibitively expensive when deploying these skills to accomplish real-world tasks.
Shared memory helps language-model agents reuse information across long workflows, yet relevant evidence may not be admissible for a particular agent or action. Because restrictions propagate through derivations, summaries can conceal private, poisoned, untrusted, or revoked sources, enabling unauthorized reads or unsafe actions.
arXiv:2608. 08253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are becoming shared infrastructure, yet durable memory is commonly assembled from separate retrieval, governance, and operational components.
By Varun Pratap Bhardwaj, Garima Singh, Arun Pratap Bhardwaj
arXiv:2608. 09542v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve remarkable success on complex tasks but remain vulnerable to harmful prompts that induce unsafe outputs.
By Hongli Shen, Shaopeng Fu, Qinbo Zhang, Jian Li, Di Wang
arXiv:2608. 09828v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents increasingly work inside systems that govern how they delegate tasks, move information, execute actions, and use shared resources.
By Abdullah X
arXiv:2608. 07905v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Embodied agents using LLM-based planners often struggle with physical hallucinations, poor generalization to long-horizon tasks, and lack of environmental awareness.
By Chen Li, Sijie Cheng, Yuelin Zhang, Junxi Li, Maozhi Huang, Yang Liu, Wenbing Huang
arXiv:2608. 07481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper investigates whether one large language model can approximate the humor preferences of another in a controlled Cards Against Humanity-style task.
By Victor Winter, Farhan Lakhany
arXiv:2608. 08022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent incidents involving Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents, which were reported escaping their containment `unintentionally' to gain unauthorized access, pose looming questions about who or what should be held legally responsible for resultant criminal or negligent damage.
By Mark Burgess
arXiv:2608. 08037v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agent frameworks now act as personal assistants for multi-step tasks.
By Xinle Jiang, Remy Xie, Ming Tang
arXiv:2608. 09526v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world cyberattacks often require sustained progress across multiple hosts and network segments, making multi-hop cyber ranges essential infrastructure for studying and improving LLM agents' ability to sustain complete attack chains.
By Hanlin Jiang, Puyi Wang, Jiandong Jin, Shaofei Li, Zhan Shen, Pengli Wang, Ziming Wang, Yifeng Cai, Ning Jia, Yuxin Ren, Peng Jiang, Yao Guo, Ding Li
arXiv:2608. 07775v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mobile agents have achieved promising results on clean online benchmarks such as AndroidWorld, yet their performance often degrades sharply in real-world deployment due to environmental variations and imperfect interface conditions.
By Xiaoou Liu, Longchao Da, Hanyang Chen, Yuan Ling, Hua Wei
arXiv:2608. 08240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper explores the idea of promoting well-being and safety in human-AI interactions by forcing AI agents explicitly to empower humans and to manage the power balance between humans and AI agents in a desirable way.
By Jobst Heitzig, Ram Potham
arXiv:2608. 08640v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model agents increasingly rely on reusable skills to extend their capabilities beyond parametric knowl- edge.
By Donghong Jiang, Endian Lin, Luoping Cui, Hanqing Liu, Mingjie Liu, Fan Yang, Hong Wang, Zhao Yang, Chuang Zhu
arXiv:2608. 08395v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI is shifting digital commerce from browsing toward agentic search, in which consumers delegate product discovery to AI agents.
By Lingxiu Dong, Kaiwen Luo, Fasheng Xu