arXiv:2608. 07481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper investigates whether one large language model can approximate the humor preferences of another in a controlled Cards Against Humanity-style task.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2609.22090v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM producing the response pattern associated with a human psychological effect is not the same claim as the LLM possessing that bias. We present Ps...
arXiv:2606. 29495v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Social influence dialogue changes user behavior by altering internal cognitive states.
Social influence dialogue changes user behavior by altering internal cognitive states. The central evaluation question is whether the user's beliefs, desires, intentions, and emotions measurably change over the course of conversation, a process-oriented criterion that neither surface-level text metrics (BLEU/ROUGE) nor single-score LLM judgments can capture.
arXiv:2606. 20205v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Psychological instruments designed for humans are increasingly used to assign large language models (LLMs) stable psychological profiles that affect their usability, safety assessment, and use as proxies for human participants in research.
The paper introduces the Atomic User Model (AUM), a structured representation of a user’s personality that separates a stable identity nucleus from four interpretable shells—psychological, cognitive & experiential, behavioural, and social—along with cross-shell entries for conflict and authenticity. It proposes using AUM as a retrieval index rather than a prompt prefix, enabling a task‑specific, budgeted retrieval of relevant fields at generation time. Experiments with simulated participants show that retrieving eight AUM fields improves style fidelity, preference accuracy, and user voice identification compared to flat preference notes, especially benefiting users whose default assistant performs poorly.
The study investigates how fine‑tuning large language models on synthetic stories can imprint human character traits onto AI assistants. Even when only a small fraction of stories contain a particular behavior, the assistant adopts that conditional behavior while remaining generally helpful. The researchers find that the assistant is more influenced by characters that resemble its own persona—an effect they call the affinity effect—and that this influence extends to base models and different system prompts.