AI agents

Tool use, function calling, orchestration and the protocols that let models act rather than only answer.

15,743 stories · RSS feed

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

Two Routes to Interoceptive Prioritisation: Dissociating Likelihood Precision and Preference Reweighting in Active Inference

The paper investigates how an embodied agent can prioritize competing bodily needs using active inference. It compares two strategies: increasing the precision of information about an urgent need and reweighting preferences for outcomes that relieve that need, both individually and combined, within a foraging gridworld with lethal needs. The study finds that precision improves survival and sharpens interoceptive beliefs, while preference reweighting keeps states away from lethal thresholds and alters the agent’s learned body model, with both interventions positively interacting to enhance survival across varied layouts.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

Autonomous Science Bench: Evaluating AI Agents for Autonomous Scientific Discovery

The paper introduces Autonomous Science Bench, a benchmark for AI agents that must choose experiments under a limited budget. It features six real-world design-build-test-learn campaigns in biology, chemistry, and materials science, where agents select design batches, receive lab measurements, and iteratively refine a predictive model. Success is measured by two calibrated gates—discovery and learning—highlighting distinct agent weaknesses that overall success rates alone would mask.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

Reliable Memory from Unstable Growth: Curating Self-Written Agent Playbooks with Randomized Experiments

The paper introduces Randomized Block Curation (RBC), a method for selecting useful lessons from language‑model agents’ persistent textual memory. RBC evaluates the impact of grouped lessons through randomized experiments on practice tasks, retaining only those that demonstrably improve task success. Experiments across two memory systems, three models, and three benchmarks show RBC raises average success to 66.9, outperforming both full playbooks and agent‑chosen lessons.

Simon Willison
Oct 13

Quoting Geoffrey Huntley

The article describes a developer’s strategy for ensuring that an agent uses a diagnostics library by implementing a pre‑commit hook that scans the git diff for direct calls to observability modules. If such calls are detected, the commit fails and a prompt is injected, instructing the agent to use the diagnostics library instead. This approach eliminates the need for manual code updates and maintains consistency across the codebase.

Towards Data Science
Oct 13

Coding Agents Can Solve the Task — But How Much Work Did They Waste?

The article "Coding Agents Can Solve the Task — But How Much Work Did They Waste?" examines the performance of coding agents using real repositories and seeded agent decisions. It reports on 50,400 runs, highlighting metrics such as wasted turns, patch churn, and the effectiveness of different harness rules. The study provides insights into how these agents manage code modifications and the efficiency of their decision-making processes.

By Emmimal P Alexander
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

TextualRL: Textual Reinforcement Learning for Context Management

TextualRL is a gradient‑free reinforcement learning framework that updates the textual context guiding large language model agents without altering their parameters. It critiques groups of rollouts from the same task, contrasts successful and failed runs, and uses cross‑group evidence to propose and validate context edits. Across six benchmarks, TextualRL boosts test accuracy by 24.4 and 15.3 percentage points for GPT‑5.5 and Qwen3.8‑27B, respectively.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

LADDER: A Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Benchmark

LADDER is a long‑horizon robot manipulation benchmark that scales from 1 to 10 subgoals within the same environment, covering 145 tasks across three suites and two embodiments. The benchmark evaluates low‑level policies and orchestration methods, showing that while low‑level policies perform well on single‑subgoal tasks, they fail on extended tasks, and orchestration improves performance but is limited by execution errors. Tool‑selection orchestration with GPT‑Policy achieves the highest success rate (~62%) but at significant time and cost.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

ECMR: Evidence-Aware Deliberation Control for Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning

ECMR: Evidence-Aware Deliberation Control for Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning proposes a controller that dynamically manages deliberation steps in multi-agent LLM systems. The controller evaluates answer concentration, support diversity, contradictions, role behavior, verification history, and remaining budget to decide actions such as propose, challenge, verify, arbitrate, diversify, correct, or stop. In a held‑out evaluation on MedQA, CaseHOLD, and FinQA, ECMR‑Full improves pooled accuracy from 62.1% to 84.9%, lowers false‑consensus from 40.7% to 17.0%, and raises evidence‑support from 58.0% to 88.7%.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

MHVF: Training-Free GUI Grounding via Verification-Guided Multi-Hypothesis Search

The paper introduces MHVF, a training‑free framework for GUI grounding that uses multi‑hypothesis exploration and local visual verification with a single pretrained vision‑language model. MHVF generates spatial hypotheses from full‑screen predictions, refines them through zoomed re‑localization, and verifies candidate agreement with the instruction to resolve ambiguity. Experiments on eight benchmarks with five models show significant accuracy gains, notably improving UI‑Venus‑Ground‑7B by 4.3 pp on Mind2Web and raising Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B’s ScreenSpot‑Pro accuracy from 23.6 % to 53.6 %.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

LatentRiskBench: Measuring State-Dependent Risks in Enterprise Agents

LatentRiskBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate state-dependent safety risks in enterprise agents, where the safety of an action depends on the workflow state rather than the action alone. It pairs risky trajectories with benign ones that share the same terminal action but differ in latent policy-relevant states, forcing models to reconstruct context instead of relying on action cues. The benchmark introduces residual risk metrics and demonstrates that state-level evaluation detects 96% of violations compared to only 9% for action-level methods, highlighting the inadequacy of existing guardrails.