arXiv Machine Learning

Variance-Adaptive Muon: Pre-Orthogonalization Variance Modulation for Efficient Language Model Pretraining

The paper introduces two variance‑adaptive variants of the Muon optimizer—Muon‑NSR and Muon‑VS—for language model pretraining. Both methods incorporate gradient‑variance information into Muon’s orthogonalization process without adding extra hyperparameters, preserving its spectral normalization structure. Experiments on Llama‑style and GPT‑2 models ranging from 125 M to 1.2 B parameters show that these variants outperform well‑tuned Muon baselines and achieve up to a 1.33× step‑to‑target speedup on Llama‑1.2B.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Spectral Allocation: Why Muon Outperforms Adam, and How to Improve Muon

The paper investigates why the orthogonal optimiser Muon outperforms Adam in large language model pretraining by analysing the spectral properties of Transformer loss landscapes. It finds that Muon’s momentum buffers exhibit an anisotropic spectral profile with a volatile head and a tolerant bulk, enabling larger effective step sizes. Building on this insight, the authors propose Spectral‑Aware Muon (SAMuon) and a lightweight variant, which adjust the bulk scaling while keeping the head unchanged, achieving 13–24 % fewer training tokens than Muon without extra FLOPs.

By Xiaodong Wu, Wenyi Yu, Chao Zhang, Philip Woodland
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

AF-Muon: An AdamW-Free Muon Optimizer for Tied-Embedding Models

AF‑Muon is an AdamW‑free extension of the Muon optimizer that retains Muon’s matrix update for hidden weights while applying a support‑aware finite‑cap linear minimization oracle to tied vocabulary tables and an RMS‑normalized update for one‑dimensional auxiliary parameters. This design eliminates second‑moment state, reducing optimizer‑state memory by about 20% compared to Hybrid Muon. Across nine tied‑token settings—including decoder‑only language models, T5‑style encoder‑decoders, and ImageGPT‑style variants—AF‑Muon consistently improves mean validation loss and perplexity over both Hybrid Muon and a SCION‑style Sign endpoint, with robust gains confirmed by long‑horizon runs and hyperparameter studies.

By Arash Lagzian, Paniz Halvachi, Junming Zhang, Zhouhan Lin, Dianbo Liu
arXiv AI
Aug 25

A Physical Response-and-Memory Model for Muon Optimization

The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.

By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv AI
Jul 16

Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

arXiv:2607. 13246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training.

By Ali Parviz, Gal Mishne, Alex Cloninger
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Musec: MomentUm SpEctral Clipping for Stable Muon-type Training

Musec introduces MomentUm SpEctral Clipping, an optimizer-level, architecture‑agnostic technique that replaces Muon’s spectral flattening with selective spectral clipping to stabilize training. By clipping singular values above a threshold while preserving the momentum’s spectral structure, Musec addresses loss spikes and unbounded weight growth without requiring architecture‑specific changes. Soft Musec, an efficient implementation using smooth spectral saturation via coupled Newton‑Schulz iterations, offers convergence guarantees in nonconvex nonsmooth stochastic optimization and empirically improves stability across diverse learning rates and model sizes.

By Zhuanghua Liu, Menglian Wang, Luo Luo
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Spectrally Targeted Muon

The paper introduces Spectrally Targeted Muon, an optimizer that orthogonalizes only singular values of update matrices above or below a threshold τ, thereby interpolating between normalized SGD and the full Muon optimizer. It uses Newton‑Schulz iteration on a shifted Gram matrix to avoid SVD, and evaluates the method on CIFAR‑10 and NanoGPT, tracking effective rank and a new alignment metric. The study finds that orthogonalizing small singular values is crucial, that shrinking large singular values keeps the parameter spectrum flat, and that AdamW differs mainly in the speed of structure formation compared to Muon.

By Vishrut Goyal, Rohan Ramkumar
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

MONA: Muon Optimizer with Nesterov Acceleration for Scalable Language Model Training

MONA is a new optimizer that extends the Muon optimizer by adding a Nesterov‑style acceleration term derived from an exponential moving average of gradient differences. The paper provides a convergence analysis showing that this term offers curvature‑aware corrections while maintaining Muon’s spectral‑norm regularization. Empirical results demonstrate that MONA outperforms both Muon and AdamW on Mixture‑of‑Experts pretraining across models ranging from 1 B to 68 B parameters, and achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on downstream benchmarks after fine‑tuning the largest model.

By Jiacheng Li, Jianchao Tan, Hongtao Xu, Jiaqi Zhang, Yifan Lu, Yerui Sun, Yuchen Xie, Xunliang Cai
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training. Its empirical success has motivated a growing body of theoretical work that interprets Muon as steepest descent under the spectral norm.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

The Best Optimizer Depends on Batch Size

The paper investigates how the choice of optimizer depends on batch size, challenging the assumption that a single optimizer remains best across different batch sizes. It demonstrates that no single scaling rule for Muon consistently works across training settings, and that the optimal optimizer for language model pretraining varies with batch size even after thorough hyperparameter tuning.

By Xingyu Dang, Kaiyue Wen, Sadhika Malladi