arXiv AI
Search Broadly, Seek Evidence on Both Sides, Decide Narrowly: Evidence-Admissible GraphRAG for Longitudinal Clinical Event Verification
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 11
CliniCARE-Bench: Clinical Calibrated Audit of Medical Reasoning in EHR
arXiv:2608. 07796v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models perform strongly on medical knowledge benchmarks, but reliable clinical deployment requires agents to conduct defensible investigations over heterogeneous, longitudinal records: determining what evidence is needed, retrieving and reconciling structured and free-text data, grounding conclusions in verifiable evidence, and deferring cases that cannot be resolved reliably.
arXiv AI
1d ago
CDEG: Learning Decision-Critical Evidence for Long-Horizon Diagnostic Agents
arXiv:2608.22899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Unlike static medical question answering, long-horizon diagnosis captures the sequential nature of clinical practice: evidence is progressively acquire...
arXiv AI
1d ago
Framework for Grounding Healthcare LLMs in a Causal Knowledge Graph: A Cardiovascular Example Pilot
arXiv:2608.15382v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for healthcare decision support, but their evaluations still reward single-answer accuracy r...
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 7
THBKG: A Temporal Biomedical Knowledge Graph for Decision-Aligned Clinical Advancement Prediction
arXiv:2608. 05982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inadequate target--disease linkage accounts for 40--50\% of Phase~II efficacy failures, so anticipating which programmes will advance would let sponsors back the hypotheses most likely to reach patients.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Grounding Healthcare LLMs in a Causal Knowledge Graph: Framework, Metrics, and a Cardiovascular Pilot
arXiv:2608. 15382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for healthcare decision support, but their evaluations still reward single-answer accuracy rather than reasoning about interventions, mechanisms, harms, evidence, and uncertainty.
arXiv AI
Jul 13
Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation vs. Long-Context Input for Clinical Reasoning over EHRs
arXiv:2508. 14817v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Objective: To evaluate whether retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can serve as an efficient alternative to long-context prompting for clinical reasoning over electronic health records (EHRs).