arXiv AI
Search Broadly, Seek Evidence on Both Sides, Decide Narrowly: Evidence-Admissible GraphRAG for Longitudinal Clinical Event Verification
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 5
Auditable Clinical Timeline Reconstruction with Provenance-Aware Evidence Graphs
The study evaluates an auditable patient‑timeline reconstruction system that tracks provenance, records revisions, and refuses to answer when evidence is missing. Using a synthetic corpus of 1,000 patients and 3,353 notes, two provenance‑aware Evidence Graph operators reduced graph size by 33–37% while preserving all answers across 6,813 query points; a fixed‑window baseline failed to answer over half of the points. The system’s evidence‑gating mechanisms (BioClinicalBERT and a zero‑shot LLM) responded appropriately to evidence‑unavailable controls, but performance varied on marker‑free controls, with BERT maintaining high accuracy but the LLM’s coverage dropping sharply. "whyItMatters":"The results demonstrate that provenance‑aware evidence graphs can significantly reduce data complexity while maintaining answer integrity, highlighting a practical approach to building auditable clinical NLP systems."
arXiv AI
Aug 11
CliniCARE-Bench: Clinical Calibrated Audit of Medical Reasoning in EHR
arXiv:2608. 07796v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models perform strongly on medical knowledge benchmarks, but reliable clinical deployment requires agents to conduct defensible investigations over heterogeneous, longitudinal records: determining what evidence is needed, retrieving and reconciling structured and free-text data, grounding conclusions in verifiable evidence, and deferring cases that cannot be resolved reliably.
arXiv AI
Sep 15
Grounded Adjudication of Variations across Extracted TimeLines (GAVEL): Comparing Clinical Timelines Against Their Case Reports
Grounded Adjudication of Variations across Extracted TimeLines (GAVEL) is a new LLM‑based protocol that compares two clinical timelines against their source case report, identifying discrepancy types, issuing verdicts, and citing relevant report passages for each difference. In a study of 126 reports, GAVEL evaluated 2,738 findings from GPT‑5.6sol and DeepSeek V3.2, ranked six LLM extractors and two human annotators, and guided a merging process that improved timeline accuracy—reducing discrepancies from 7.63 to 0.85 per report and yielding a 77.0% preference rate for merged timelines. The approach demonstrates that report‑based comparison can refine extracted timelines without assuming any single timeline as ground truth.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
CDEG: Learning Decision-Critical Evidence for Long-Horizon Diagnostic Agents
arXiv:2608.22899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Unlike static medical question answering, long-horizon diagnosis captures the sequential nature of clinical practice: evidence is progressively acquire...
arXiv AI
Sep 21
Consistent Relexicalization of Clinical Documents using Graph-Based Approach
arXiv:2609.21387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Relexicalization is a pivotal technique in clinical NLP, as it facilitates robust masking of sensitive information while synthesizing datasets that r...
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago
A Two-Level Clinical Novelty Prioritization Framework for Disease Trajectories Discovered from Longitudinal Electronic Health Records
arXiv:2610.20512v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph-based analysis of electronic health records (EHRs) yields disease-trajectory catalogs, but structural support does not establish semantic novelty...