arXiv Computer Vision By Betsy Villa Brochero, Ian Gibson, Estefania Talavera

PCB-MC: Missing Component Analysis in Printed Circuit Boards

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

PCB-MC is a new dataset for detecting missing components on printed circuit boards, featuring 197 distinct board types with footprint-level annotations derived from the RF100 dataset. The dataset includes multiple augmented samples per board type and introduces board type-aware cross‑validation splits to prevent layout leakage between training and test sets. Benchmark results show that supervised models suffer high false‑negative rates on unseen board designs, while unsupervised anomaly detection methods fail due to misalignment with board-specific references, highlighting the remaining challenges in missing component detection across diverse PCB layouts.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

Quality Inspection of Printed Circuit Board Pin Insertion via Semantic Segmentation and Board-Level Feature Extraction

The paper introduces an automated defect detection system for printed circuit board (PCB) pin insertion, combining U‑Net semantic segmentation with contour‑based feature extraction and logistic regression for board‑level pass/fail classification. Segmentation masks generate contour representations of individual pins, from which features such as average contour size are extracted to train the classifier. Evaluated on an industrial dataset and a public PCB pin‑inspection dataset, the method achieved ROC‑AUC scores of 0.990 and 1.000, outperforming PatchCore and instance‑segmentation baselines.

By Nils Rabeneck, Andr\'e Kiunke, Nicole Hoess, Wolfgang Mauerer
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

ISP-AD: A Large-Scale Real-World Dataset for Advancing Industrial Anomaly Detection with Synthetic and Real Defects

The paper introduces ISP-AD, the largest publicly available industrial anomaly detection dataset, featuring both synthetic and real defects from a factory floor. It focuses on challenging, small, weakly contrasted surface defects within highly variable structured patterns, addressing the bias of existing datasets toward ideal imaging conditions. Experiments demonstrate that even a small amount of weakly labeled real defects improves model generalization and that synthetic defects can serve as a useful cold‑start baseline for scalable training.

By Paul J. Krassnig, Dieter P. Gruber
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

From Benchmark Performance to Tool Deployment: Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2608. 07770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated anomaly detection methods often report strong performance on curated academic benchmarks, but their behavior under real-world industrial conditions is less clear.

By Mike Szklarzewski, CJ George, Gavin Smithson, Christopher Stokes, Dakota Fulp, William M. Jones, Benjamin Wynn, Alexander Ur, Agit Yesiloz, Clint Kallenbach, Mark Swartz, Nathan DeBardeleben, Sharmistha Chakrabarti
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Training-Free Logical and Structural Anomaly Detection via Calibrated Fusion

The paper introduces a training‑free anomaly detector that simultaneously handles structural and logical defects by calibrating heterogeneous anomaly cues with statistics from normal images. This calibration aligns frozen representations, allowing their fusion without extra training or part‑level supervision. The resulting method achieves state‑of‑the‑art AUROC scores on MVTec‑LOCO and remains competitive on MVTec‑AD.

By Changyi Li, Miao Yu, Kai Dong, Yu Xiao
arXiv AI
Sep 1

SePArate: Segmenting Patterns from Defects in Wafer Manufacturing Using Weak Supervision

SePArate is a weakly supervised method for segmenting patterns from defects in semiconductor wafers. It uses only image‑level annotations and follows a three‑phase training process: encoder pretraining, knowledge transfer for spatial cues, and training on synthetic mixed‑defect data. Experiments show that SePArate outperforms baseline approaches in pixel‑level defect segmentation.

By Dain Kwon, Changmin Shin, Sunjong Park, Kanghyun Choi, Hyeyoon Lee, Jaewon Jang, Minseok Choi, Jinho Lee