arXiv Machine Learning By Viraj Patel, Marko Grujic, Philipp Aigner, Theodor Abart, Marcus Granegger, Deblina Bhattacharjee, Katharine Fraser

Learning Disease-Sensitive Latent Interaction Graphs From Noisy Cardiac Flow Measurements

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2602. 23035v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Cardiac blood flow patterns contain rich information about disease severity and clinical interventions, yet current imaging and computational methods fail to capture underlying relational structures of coherent flow features.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 17

Learning Unsteady Aneurysm Hemodynamics with Physics-Informed DeepONets

arXiv:2608. 13629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clinically actionable, patient-specific hemodynamic assessment, specifically wall shear stress, vortex structure and pressure distributions, is critical for determining risky or unfavorable evolution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA).

By Oscar L. Cruz-Gonzalez, Val\'erie Deplano, Badih Ghattas
arXiv AI
Jun 26

A Latent ODE Approach to Spatiotemporal Modeling of Cine Cardiac MRI

arXiv:2606. 26718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) captures rich spatiotemporal information about ventricular structure and motion, but conventional risk models use only a few image-derived indices from selected cardiac phases.

By David Br\"uggemann, Ekaterina Krymova, Firat \"Ozdemir, Jochen von Spiczak, Sebastian Kozerke, Samia Mora, Robert Manka, Mathieu Salzmann, Olga V. Demler
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Physics-Informed Hemodynamic Modeling for Data-Free Prediction and Sparse-Data Assimilation

The paper introduces a physics-informed deep learning framework that reconstructs 3D coronary geometry from dual-view angiography and predicts velocity and pressure fields using a decoupled network with embedded physical priors. Across 32 patients and four flow conditions, the model achieved a trans‑stenotic pressure‑drop error of 2.02% and velocity/pressure relative‑L2 errors of 0.054 and 0.023, respectively, while matching hospital‑measured FFR with 93.8% diagnostic accuracy. The pipeline completes the full angiography‑to‑hemodynamics conversion in about 20 minutes per patient and supports sparse‑data assimilation for revascularization planning.

By Xi Chen, Jianchuan Yang, Hongde Li, Guangxin He, Qiuyu Ye, Qiang Luo, Mao Chen, Wenqi Hu