The paper evaluates whether a 9‑billion parameter decision foundation model, Clef‑Flash, is necessary for symptom‑to‑disease classification. Fine‑tuning the model on the 24‑class Symptom2Disease benchmark yields 95.42% accuracy, but simple TF‑IDF linear classifiers achieve higher accuracy (98.75%) with far faster inference. Ablation studies show that predictions can hinge on single descriptive clauses, indicating that the benchmark may not fully capture the model’s capabilities.
By S. M. Mahbub Uddin Ahmed
arXiv:2611.07950v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Benchmarks of class-imbalance strategies for multimodal chest X-ray (CXR) and electronic health record (EHR) prediction are often evaluated on record-l...
By Dang-Khoa Bui, Quang-Huy Tran, Minh-Khoi Nguyen-Bui, Duc-Tuan Ngo, Thanh-Trong Tran, Tuan-Khoi Nguyen, Hoang-Anh Ngo
arXiv:2610.15029v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Automated disease classification from patient-reported symptoms requires balancing the speed of lightweight discriminative models against the context...
By S. M. Mahbub Uddin Ahmed
The paper introduces a framework that distinguishes two causes of saturation in clinical prediction: a learner gap, where the model fails to use available information, and a measurement‑channel ceiling, where the recorded variables limit performance. It provides theoretical characterizations, finite‑sample diagnostics, and empirical audits across three large cohorts, showing that well‑tuned models approach the frontier while deficient learners leave large gaps. A PRISMA‑guided synthesis across 104 tasks reveals consistent channel‑level patterns, suggesting that improving the learner or the measurement channel can audit and potentially lift performance.
By Sayeed Shafayet Chowdhury, Nusrat Jahan, Snehasis Mukhopadhyay, Shiaofen Fang, Vijay R. Ramakrishnan
arXiv:2608. 15725v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predictive models in clinical and regulated settings must be accurate and fully auditable.
By Srikumar Krishnamoorthy
Shortcut learning occurs when classifiers rely on spurious correlations instead of true diagnostic features. The authors argue that this is essentially a calibration issue: unconstrained training aligns shortcut groups with their prevalence, causing over‑confidence in one group and under‑confidence in another. They introduce two encoder‑agnostic methods—a regularizer and a post‑hoc recalibration—to equalize prevalence across shortcut groups, achieving significant performance gains on chest‑drain‑pneumothorax benchmarks with both fine‑tuned CNNs and frozen foundation‑model backbones.
By Mohamed Amine Kina, Eike Petersen