arXiv AI By Fengjunjie Pan, Alois Knoll

Dr. AGENTONOMICS: A Didactic Experiment of AGENTONOMICS

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 03524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AGENTONOMICS is a framework that treats AI agents as economic entities that can be designed, managed, and governed through an integrated management architecture.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 16

Lect\=uraAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Adaptive Personalized AI-Assisted Learning and Embodied Teaching

arXiv:2606. 16428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Effective personalized AI-assisted learning demands systems that can not only generate accurate learner-specific educational materials, but also dynamically adapt their instruction to diverse learners.

By Jaward Sesay, Yue Yu, Siwei Dong, Yemin Shi, Guangyao Chen, B\"orje F. Karlsson
arXiv AI
Sep 18

DataCanvas-EDU: An Agentic Framework for Instructor-Guided Synthetic Data Generation in Business Analytics Education

DataCanvas-EDU is an agentic framework that lets instructors guide the creation of synthetic datasets for business analytics courses. Instructors set teaching goals and desired patterns via conversation, and an AI agent writes generation code, verifies the data, and produces assignments, reference solutions, and rubrics. The process is organized into four phases—Plan, Create, Verify/Test Analysis, and Evaluate—to streamline case preparation and enable students to explore new patterns with AI.

By Bang An, Maria Hamdani, Joseph Fox
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Agent0: Unleashing Self-Evolving Agents from Zero Data via Tool-Integrated Reasoning

Agent0 is a fully autonomous framework that enables large language model agents to evolve without external data by using a multi‑step co‑evolution process. It pits a curriculum agent against an executor agent, both derived from the same base LLM, where the curriculum agent creates increasingly challenging tasks and the executor learns to solve them. By integrating external tools into the executor’s workflow, the system creates a self‑reinforcing cycle that continuously generates high‑quality curricula, leading to significant gains in reasoning performance—an 18% improvement on mathematical reasoning and 24% on general reasoning for the Qwen3‑8B‑Base model.

By Peng Xia, Kaide Zeng, Jiaqi Liu, Can Qin, Fang Wu, Yiyang Zhou, Caiming Xiong, Huaxiu Yao