arXiv AI By Savini Kommalage, Sanka Mohottala, Asiri Gawesha, Dulara Madhusanka, Menan Velayuthan, Dharshana Kasthurirathna, Mahima Milinda Alwis Weerasinghe, Charith Abhayaratne

Confusion-Aware Transfer Teacher Curriculum Learning Framework: Disentangling Scoring and Pacing Effects

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 17706v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Curriculum learning couples two design choices, how samples are scored by difficulty and how harder samples are paced into training, making it difficult to attribute observed gains to either component.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

Understanding Curriculum Learning in Large Language Models via Cross-Difficulty Optimization Dynamics

The paper investigates why curriculum learning—ordering training data from easy to hard—varies in effectiveness across reasoning tasks. By studying optimization dynamics, the authors introduce Relative Transfer, a measure of cross‑difficulty knowledge transfer, and use it to create Transfer‑aware Dynamic Curriculum Sampling (TDCS). Experiments show TDCS outperforms existing scheduling strategies on multiple reasoning benchmarks, offering a unified optimization‑based explanation for curriculum learning.

By Zhikai Ding, Ziyi Ye
arXiv AI
Jun 2

DASH: Dual-Branch Score Distillation for Guidance-Calibrated Compact Diffusion Models

arXiv:2606. 00798v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter compression of class-conditional diffusion models reveals an underexplored limitation in output-level distillation: the unconditional score branch remains unsupervised, leaving the classifier-free guidance gap underdetermined in the student.

By Abdullah Al Shafi, Kazi Saeed Alam, Sk Imran Hossain, Engelbert Mephu Nguifo
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

CA-OPD: Confidence-Aware On-Policy Distillation for Structured Visual Prediction

CA-OPD is a confidence‑aware on‑policy distillation framework that improves structured visual prediction by using teacher confidence to selectively correct unreliable student transitions and gradually transfer rollout control to the student. The method aligns supervision with intervention decisions, providing direct cross‑entropy loss for corrected tokens and full predictive distribution for retained tokens. In a multi‑teacher setting for GUI grounding and OCR, CA‑OPD significantly outperforms the Qwen3.5‑0.8B baseline, achieving large gains on benchmarks such as ScreenSpot‑Pro and OCRBench‑v2 English.

By Menghao Li, Linjie Mu, Yin Wang, Haotian Hu, Yannian Gu, Lujiayi Xue, Fanyi Wang