arXiv AI By Timothy Oladunni, Farouk Ganiyu-Adewumi

Complementary Feature Domains: Information Preservation Does Not Imply Predictive-Contribution Preservation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Refinement as a Service: Algorithmic Predictor Refinement

The paper investigates how to combine multiple calibrated predictors into a single refined predictor that preserves all available information and cannot be further refined. It models calibrated predictors as signaling schemes and defines refinement via feature‑independent garblings, showing that a new predictor is constructible exactly when its signal vector lies in the linear span of the input signal vectors. The authors provide algorithmic results: deterministic refinement is polynomial‑time solvable for two predictors but NP‑hard for many, while randomized refinement admits a polynomial‑time algorithm for any number of inputs by decomposing signal vectors into extreme rays of a polyhedral cone.

By Wei Tang, Hanrui Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30

Decision-Value Attribution in Predict-then-Optimize Systems

arXiv:2606. 29878v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predictive models are increasingly embedded in operational decision-making, yet standard explanation methods typically explain forecasts rather than the decisions those forecasts induce.

By Konstantinos Ziliaskopoulos, Alexander Vinel, Alice E. Smith