arXiv:2608.27690v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Cardiovascular risk prediction remains limited by incomplete clinical data and imaging biomarkers that reduce computed tomography (CT) to a small num...
By Roy Gabriel, Nattakorn Kittisut, Jamshid Hassanpour, Michael Galarnyk, Abanoub Abdelmalak, Marly van Assen, Carlo N. De Cecco, Arshed Quyyumi, Ali Adibi
arXiv:2609.22281v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Foundation models have recently demonstrated strong capabilities across a wide range of medical imaging tasks. However, their performance in structured...
By Benjamin Renoust, Pierre Baudot, Tiffany Foriel, Yousra Haddou, Charles Voyton, Pierre-Henri Siot, Ezequiel Geremia, Danny Francis, Jean-Christophe Brisset, Val\'erie Bourd\`es, Sylvain Bodard, Benoit Huet
Med-AR introduces two autoregressive vision‑language models, Med‑AR‑8B and Med‑AR‑2B, pretrained on structured radiology reports, abnormality‑focused text, and region annotations to address long‑tailed chest X‑ray classification. The models outperform existing contrastive, self‑supervised, and supervised encoders—including Med‑CLIP, CheXFound, EVA‑Base, ARK, and BioViL‑T—across PadChest, MIMIC‑CXR, and CheXpert, achieving higher mean AUROC and AUPRC for head, medium, and tail findings and lower excess area under the risk‑coverage curve. Med‑AR also demonstrates improved selective‑prediction performance, with Med‑AR‑8B raising tail‑label mean AUPRC on MIMIC‑CXR from 0.1033 to 0.1441 and Med‑AR‑2B delivering the strongest discrimination on PadChest.
By Janhavi Prabhu, Sahil, Akshay V, Shivam Shukla, Manoj Tadepalli, Preetham Putha
arXiv:2608.30021v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Errors in radiology reports can adversely affect patient treatment, yet automated report quality assurance remains challenging because errors are oft...
By Hermione Warr, Harry Anthony, Lilli J Freischem, Yasin Ibrahim, Daniel R McGowan, Konstantinos Kamnitsas
arXiv:2606. 17710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language models report strong chest radiograph accuracy, and this is increasingly read as evidence that they use the image.
By Mahshad Lotfinia, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Lisa Adams, Daniel Truhn, Andreas Maier, Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh
arXiv:2607. 25589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases.
By Mateusz Koz{\l}owski