arXiv AI By Angelina Chen, Rick Sullivan, Raffaele F Ciriello

Aesthetic Perspectives in Information Systems Research: A Hermeneutic Analysis

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 09839v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How might implicit aesthetic perspectives shape what Information Systems (IS) scholarship recognises as worthy of study (or not)?

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

MIT News AI
Jun 29

3 Questions: Beyond data-driven aesthetics

In a new Keller Gallery exhibition, Alexandros Haridis SM ’17, PhD ’22 traces centuries of ideas about aesthetic judgment and explores how design can make complex computational systems visible.

By School of Architecture and Planning
arXiv AI
Sep 1

The Landscape of Generative AI in Information Systems: A Synthesis of Secondary Reviews and Research Agendas

The paper reviews secondary studies and research agendas on generative AI (GenAI) in information systems, synthesizing evidence from 28 selected papers. It identifies GenAI’s transformative benefits—productivity, innovation, personalization, and democratized expertise—while highlighting challenges such as technical unreliability, ethical risks, and governance gaps. The authors propose a research agenda that shifts IS scholarship toward shaping the co‑evolution of AI capabilities with organizational routines, societal values, and regulatory institutions, emphasizing hybrid human‑AI ensembles, situated validation, design principles for probabilistic systems, and adaptive governance.

By Aleksander Jarz\k{e}bowicz, Adam Przyby{\l}ek, Jacinto Estima, Yen Ying Ng, Jakub Swacha, Beata Zielosko, Lech Madeyski, Noel Carroll, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Bartosz Marcinkowski, Alberto Rodrigues da Silva, Viktoria Stray, Netta Iivari, Anh Nguyen-Duc, Jorge Melegati, Boris Deliba\v{s}i\'c, Emilio Insfran
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Abstracted Away: Resisting Alienation and Ungrounded Abstraction in AI Research Communities

arXiv:2608. 08408v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Logics of abstraction in computational AI research often push important forms of knowledge and reflection aside: dominant standards of legitimacy separate from lived experience of harm; the goals of work misalign with the practices that operationalize them; and career demands crowd out critical reflection.

By Vyoma Raman, Isabel O. Gallegos, Neha Srivathsa