MIT News AI

3 Questions: Beyond data-driven aesthetics

In a new Keller Gallery exhibition, Alexandros Haridis SM ’17, PhD ’22 traces centuries of ideas about aesthetic judgment and explores how design can make complex computational systems visible.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Editable Visual Design

Editable Visual Design introduces a new design paradigm that combines a Coding Agent with a Vision‑Language Model (VLM) and an image generation model. The VLM acts as the creative brain, understanding requirements, planning tasks, and judging aesthetics, while the image generator produces isolated visual assets on demand. The agent follows an "imagine first, then act" workflow, generating assets, writing native HTML/CSS, and refining the design through visual feedback, ultimately producing editable, layer‑wise artifacts with real text that can be adjusted via a graphical interface.

By Junyan Ye, Wei Liu, Dongzhi Jiang, Zichen Wen, HaoDong Li, Zhutao Lv, Jiaxin Lin, Jinhua Yu, Jun He, Zilong Huang, Rui Chen, Weijia Li
arXiv AI
Jun 26

COrigami: An AI Pipeline for Co-Designing Flat-Foldable Visually Recognisable Origami

arXiv:2606. 26299v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While generative AI has achieved remarkable success in solving problems with verifiable solutions, generating physical art that satisfies both strict geometric constraints and subjective visual aesthetics remains a challenge.

By Tom Zahavy, Shaobo Hou, Thomas Tumiel, James Doran, Francesco Faccio, Xidong Feng, Alex Havrilla, Igor Khytryi, Chenglei Li, Lisa Schut, Vivek Veeriah, Arijan Abrashi, Micha{\l} Kosmulski, Robert J. Lang, Nick Robinson, Brandon Wong, Marcus Chiam, Gloria Fang, Satinder Singh
arXiv AI
Aug 28

AesCanvas: A Large-Scale Dataset and Benchmark for Aesthetic Critique and Contextual Suitability

AesCanvas is a new dataset and benchmark that evaluates image aesthetic models on two fronts: CritiqueCanvas, which contains 519,136 instruction–response pairs for long‑form, multi‑dimensional critique across photography, painting, and virtual imagery, and ContextCanvas, which offers 301 expert‑reviewed use scenarios to assess contextual aesthetic suitability. The benchmark tests closed‑source, open‑weight general, and aesthetic‑specific multimodal large language models, revealing that models excel at critique generation but lag in context‑sensitive judgment. The study shows that aesthetic specialization does not reliably transfer to contextual suitability and highlights the need for culturally situated, evidence‑grounded suitability as a distinct objective for aesthetic modeling.

By Xuanwei Hu, Haoyu Dong, Kejun Wu, Tianyi Liu, Jianjun Gao