arXiv:2607. 26577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adaptive conformal inference (ACI) of Gibbs and Cand{\`e}s and its variants are the standard approach to online conformal prediction under distribution shift, but they suffer from three fundamental limitations.
By Rahul Vaze
arXiv:2605. 14953v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We address the problem of conformal selection, where an agent must select a minimal subset of options to ensure that at least one ``success'' is identified with a pre-specified target probability $\phi$.
By Sreenivas Gollapudi, Kostas Kollias, Kamesh Munagala, Ali Sinop
arXiv:2508.10336v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: In a supervised online setting, quantifying uncertainty has been proposed in the seminal work of Gibbs and Cand\`es (2021). For any given poi...
By Pierre Humbert, Ulysse Gazin, Ruth Heller, Etienne Roquain
arXiv:2306. 02704v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce \emph{Calibrated Stackelberg Games (CSGs)}, a generalization of the standard Stackelberg Games (SGs) framework.
By Nika Haghtalab, Chara Podimata, Kunhe Yang
The paper addresses the failure of online conformal prediction when predictions influence actions that determine which outcomes are used for calibration. It introduces Propensity-Weighted Online Conformal Prediction (PW‑OCP), an inverse‑propensity‑weighted recursion that debiases calibration, and a doubly robust variant (DR‑OCP) that further reduces bias. Experiments on synthetic decision tasks, open bandit data, and financial rebalancing demonstrate that PW‑OCP and DR‑OCP improve counterfactual coverage and downstream regret while preserving prediction‑set sharpness.
By Xinyu Qiao, Yichen Lin, Kaihong Ji, Xue Wang, Tao Yao
arXiv:2606. 06486v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we study regret minimization in repeated games with \emph{adaptive} opponents who can respond based on histories of play.
By Mingyang Liu, Asuman Ozdaglar, Tiancheng Yu, Kaiqing Zhang