Hugging Face Trending Papers

From Attack Success to Attack Severity: Counterfactual Memory Attacks on LLM Agents

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

CAPTURE: Disentangling Preference Drift from Memory Poisoning in Personalized LLM Agents

The paper introduces CAPTURE, a system designed to help personalized language agents distinguish genuine preference changes from temporary context shifts or malicious memory poisoning. CAPTURE employs a neural differential-equation belief tracker, a multi-timescale memory ledger, uncertainty-triggered clarification, and counterfactual auditing to resolve ambiguity. Experiments on 480 episodes from 96 users show CAPTURE outperforms baseline methods, limiting poisoning success while accepting most real preference updates.

By S M Asif Hossain, Ruksat Khan Shayoni, Md Kishor Morol
arXiv AI
Aug 25

InjecMEM: Memory Injection Attack on LLM Agent Memory Systems

InjecMEM introduces a memory injection attack that can steer the responses of large language model agents toward a desired output using only a single interaction, without needing read or edit access to the memory store. The attack leverages the retrieval‑then‑generate workflow of memory systems by crafting a retriever‑agnostic anchor with high‑recall topical cues and an adversarial command optimized through gradient‑based coordinate search. Experiments across various memory systems and backbone models show that InjecMEM reliably induces topic‑conditioned retrieval and targeted generation, remains effective even when memory drifts, and does not affect non‑target queries.

By Hanling Tian, Gengyu Zhang, Zeyang Sha, Jingying Wang, Yuhang Liu, Zhehao Huang, Kun Yang, Xiaolin Huang
arXiv AI
Sep 3

AdaMem: Learning What to Remember with Adaptive Memory Policies for Personalized Agents

AdaMem introduces adaptive memory policies that allow personalized agents to decide what information to write into long‑term memory based on user preferences for each interaction context. Each policy is updated from periodic feedback and controls subsequent memory writing, aiming to improve relevance and reduce unnecessary memory persistence. In experiments on AdaMem‑Bench, AdaMem raises QA accuracy from 80.0% to 84.35% while cutting persistent memory by 9.27%, though models still struggle to execute policies reliably.

By Xingyu Chen, Rui Wang, Zhaopeng Tu, Liefeng Bo