Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks. Yet nearly all existing approaches, from graph-structured memories to reflective insight stores, access memory through fixed, hand-designed heuristics.
arXiv:2607. 13591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks.
By Eric Hanchen Jiang, Zhi Zhang, Yuchen Wu, Levina Li, Dong Liu, Xiao Liang, Rui Sun, Yubei Li, Edward Sun, Haozheng Luo, Zhaolu Kang, Aylin Caliskan, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu
MemoryArena is a new evaluation gym that benchmarks agent memory in interdependent multi‑session tasks. Unlike prior benchmarks that test memorization or single‑session action in isolation, MemoryArena requires agents to acquire memory while interacting with the environment and then use that memory to guide future decisions across a range of tasks such as web navigation, planning, information search, and formal reasoning. The benchmark reveals that agents excelling on existing long‑context memory tests perform poorly here, highlighting a gap in current memory evaluation methods.
By Zexue He, Yu Wang, Churan Zhi, Yuanzhe Hu, Tzu-Ping Chen, Lang Yin, Ze Chen, Tong Arthur Wu, Siru Ouyang, Zihan Wang, Jiaxin Pei, Julian McAuley, Yejin Choi, Alex Pentland
The paper introduces AMBER, an append‑only memory framework for language‑model agents that interact over long horizons. AMBER lets agents jointly learn to reason, act, and write free‑form memory, guaranteeing retention by construction and enabling end‑to‑end reinforcement learning without extensive curated data. Experiments on WebArena Lite show AMBER outperforms overwrite‑based memory by 4.09 percentage points in average success and improves task completion rates in repeated runs.
By Chinmay Savadikar, Zhaoyu Zhang, Mingyu Zhao, Shuang Xie, Han Li, Tianfu Wu, Lingyun Wang
The paper introduces MemPABench, an interactive environment designed to evaluate how personal agents remember and act on user interaction preferences. The benchmark features long‑horizon tasks where agents must decide when to clarify, confirm, or act autonomously, using data from four simulated users who provided 99 sessions over four months and five preference changes each. Experiments across four memory systems and LLM backbones show that current memory approaches offer limited improvement in preference selection, with retrieval‑based methods performing no better than no memory and file‑based memory sometimes applying preferences in irrelevant contexts.
By Jialin Li, Zhenhao Chen, Hanjun Luo, Hanan Salam
DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.
By Yifei Tao, Xinyu Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Fanyi Wang, Tengda Guo, Wentao Qiu, Ying Wang, Liujian Tang