arXiv:2606. 06055v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory enables language model agents to support personalized interactions, but it remains unclear when available memories warrant integration into responses.
By Lingxiang Xu, Jiaoyun Yang, Min Hu, Hongtu Chen, Ning An
arXiv:2607. 01071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators.
By Zhishang Xiang, Zerui Chen, Yunbo Tang, Zhimin Wei, Ruqin Ning, Yujie Lin, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su
Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning.
arXiv:2610.18052v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-term memory has become a core component of large language model (LLM) agents. As agents accumulate personal information over long-term use, users...
By Bofan Xie, Chaokun Wang, Guanchen Ge, Songyao Wang, Fang Niu, Hang Zhang, Wei Wang
MemCut introduces a benchmark to test user-requested forgetting in large language model agents, featuring 456 hand-designed secrets embedded in long-horizon conversations with fully annotated evidence trails. The benchmark defines two recovery metrics—native and residual—to assess how well secrets can be retrieved after deletion. Experiments across five memory designs and four LLMs show that deletion reduces native recovery more than residual recovery, highlighting candidate coverage as a key bottleneck.
By Cheng Zhang, Xuanning Cao, Zhicheng Zheng, Hui Xiong
The paper investigates how large language model agents can over-rely on agentic memory, a phenomenon where retrieved memories distort inference even when they are correctly stored and retrieved. It shows that memory is helpful when past experience fully transfers to the current task but becomes misleading under partial query-memory overlap, a pattern confirmed by controlled experiments. To address this, the authors propose MEMTRIM, a plug‑and‑play framework that indexes memory evidence at write time and limits its reuse at read time, thereby reducing over-reliance without retraining and preserving useful memory benefits across models and memory architectures.
By Luoxi Tang, Yuqiao Meng, Nilesh Auradkar, Muchao Ye, Dazheng Zhang, Zhaohan Xi
The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.
By Shweta Mishra, Shashank Mishra
arXiv:2609.16073v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) serves as the primary memory architecture for long-horizon autonomous agents. However, treating shared memory as...
By Hamed HaddadPajouh, Amir AmiriTabat
The paper introduces ConMem, an algorithm that uses counterfactual causal inference to improve long‑term memory management in large language model agents. It builds a benchmark called MemAlign with 1,079 curated memory cases that capture various misalignment issues such as over‑generalization, misattribution, and privacy concerns. ConMem generates counterfactual interaction scenarios to audit retention decisions, leading to higher accuracy (75.16%) and better balance than existing methods while preserving personalization.
By Shuning Zhang, Tenghao Ji, Jingruo Chen, Eryue Xu, Bohao Chu, Xin Yi
UTILMEM is a new diagnostic benchmark that tests how conversational agents use long‑term memory, focusing on reasoning over dense histories, spotting implicitly relevant memories, synthesizing distributed evidence, and resisting interference from similar distractors. It contains 1,717 instances across five domains and evaluates a range of retrieval‑based and memory‑augmented systems. The study shows that strong performance on traditional factual recall does not guarantee effective memory utilization, highlighting a gap between retrieving information and integrating it into coherent, task‑oriented outputs.
By Peijun Qing, Fobo Shi, Soroush Vosoughi
arXiv:2606. 13177v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to operate over long-term interactions, where information from past dialogues must be preserved and recalled to support future tasks.
By Minjae Kim, Jinheon Baek, Soyeong Jeong, Sung Ju Hwang
arXiv:2605.28009v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Memory-augmented large language models extend reasoning beyond a fixed context window by maintaining long-term memory across interactions. Ho...
By Hyeonjeong Ha, Jeonghwan Kim, Cheng Qian, Jiayu Liu, William M. Campbell, Yue Wu, Yuji Zhang, Kathleen McKeown, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Heng Ji