arXiv:2609.13240v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 classes, 1549:1 head-to-...
By Jian Li, Fanfan Ji, Jinxiang Lai, Ying Tai, Jian Yang, Xiao-Tong Yuan, Chengjie Wang, Yabiao Wang
arXiv:2608. 05026v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-quality annotation of artworks is essential for computational art research, yet extracting implicit semantics remains challenging due to the reliance on culturally grounded meanings and deep contextual knowledge behind the images.
By Xiaoyan Gu, Yifang Wang, Wenqing Zheng, Haozhong Liu, Yixia Zheng, Peiyi Jiang, Wenjie Ning, Wei Zhang, Wei Chen
arXiv:2607. 23126v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI design tools make natural-language prompts a starting point for design, placing new articulation demands on designers.
By Daisaku Sato
arXiv:2601. 15797v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many theorists maintain that conscious intentional agency is a necessary condition of creativity.
By James S. Pearson, Matthew J. Dennis, Marc Cheong
arXiv:2606. 02357v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-augmented multimodal agents show strong benchmark gains, often taken as evidence that agents have learned to use tools.
By Garvin Guo, Donglei Yu, Yu Chen, Xiang Wang, Shuai Li, Xinpei Zhao, Huaxing Liu, Qinghao Wang, Minpeng Liao
The paper investigates general‑purpose coding agents that generate images by writing and executing programs, contrasting them with conventional generative models. On the AgentDrawBench benchmark, these agents excel at preserving structure and meeting precise visual constraints, achieving competitive performance in tasks where compositional accuracy outweighs photorealism, though they fall short in perceptual richness. The study further shows that the agents’ visual code can serve as an external language of thought, retaining substantial information for visual question answering and suggesting an internal, compositionally structured representation that guides visual operations across different drawing interfaces.
By Hengguang Zhou, Yuanhao Ban, Jiaqi Feng, Xiaohuan Pei, Justin Cui, Cho-Jui Hsieh
arXiv:2607. 17940v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper frames Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) not as an unprecedented technological rupture, but as an industrial-scale manifestation of a deeply rooted historical process.
By Giorgio Presti
ATP‑Bench proposes a new benchmark for evaluating agentic tool planning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that generate interleaved text-and-image responses. The benchmark contains 7,702 QA pairs, including 1,592 visual‑question‑answer pairs, across eight categories and 25 visual‑critical intents, all verified by humans. A Multi‑Agent MLLM‑as‑a‑Judge (MAM) system is introduced to assess tool‑call precision, missed opportunities, and overall response quality without relying on ground‑truth references.
By Yinuo Liu, Zi Qian, Heng Zhou, Jiahao Zhang, Yajie Zhang, Zhihang Li, Mengyu Zhou, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang
arXiv:2608. 04148v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI is increasingly used to coordinate planning, implementation, review, and testing in software development, yet it often offers limited transparency into its decisions and interactions.
By Zihan Fang, Yueke Zhang, Yu Huang
Sanyu Studio is a multi‑agent dialogue system that treats 321 Sanyu oil paintings as agents equipped with fact, interpretation, organization, and memory‑filtering mechanisms. The paper reports on a seven‑day workshop with eight art‑university participants, showing that user prompts, evidence organization, and cognitive tendencies produced divergent yet coherent digital narratives of Sanyu. The study suggests that, when historical evidence is limited, AI can amplify human agency and provide public audiences with an interactive entry point into art‑historical interpretation.
By Zhaoxi Wei, Hongye Yang, Shuyuan Tian
The paper introduces the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), a new measure of delegated exposure that captures whether workers actually commit tasks to AI within structured workflows. Using semantic embeddings of 888,000 agent skill specifications from GitHub and 18,000 O*NET task statements, the authors find that occupations with high delegation differ from those most vulnerable to pre-AI automation, that AAI correlates more with technical capability than with current LLM use, and that for lower‑educated occupations AAI rises with wages while it falls for higher‑educated, high‑earning workers. These patterns also appear in an independent corpus from the Manus Skills Marketplace.
By Hyeongjae Lee, Jihyang Cheon, Lanu Kim
The paper surveys how large multimodal models (LMMs) enhance agentic frameworks that combine perception, memory, reasoning, planning, and action. It examines the integration of multiple modalities—text, images, audio, and video—through delegated, late‑fusion, and early‑fusion architectures, and maps these designs to agent capabilities. The survey also reviews multimodal agentic systems in robotics, web navigation, multimedia content creation, and video understanding, evaluating performance, efficiency, and scalability trade‑offs.
By Neel Mokaria, Rishie Raj, Dheeraj Baiju, Xiaoqian Shen, Shraman Pramanick, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Arda Senocak, Mike Zheng Shou, Philip Torr, Mohamed Elhoseiny, Yapeng Tian, Ruohan Gao, Salman Khan, Sayan Nag, Sanjoy Chowdhury, Dinesh Manocha