arXiv Computation and Language

QoNext: Towards Next-generation QoE for Foundation Models

QoNext is a new framework that applies Quality of Experience (QoE) principles from networking and multimedia to evaluate foundation models in a conversational setting. It identifies experiential factors that influence user experience, collects human ratings in controlled interaction scenarios, and builds a database and neural predictor to estimate user satisfaction from system parameters. The framework demonstrates the ability to decode the mechanisms of user satisfaction and predict human sentiment across varied service conditions.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Assessing Quality of Experience in Natural Language Generation of German Text

The paper introduces TextQ‑German, a dataset suite for evaluating German natural language generation (NLG) from a Quality of Experience (QoE) perspective, covering tasks such as summarization and machine translation. Human ratings collected via crowdsourcing identify perceptual quality dimensions, and the authors develop automatic QoE prediction models—including transformer‑based, linguistic feature‑based, and hybrid approaches—showing that hybrid models outperform pure transformers and that linguistic features alone can rival fine‑tuned language models. The dataset is further enriched with large language model (LLM) outputs annotated with overall QoE scores, and validation on held‑out data demonstrates generalization to unseen data. "whyItMatters":"The resource provides a publicly accessible benchmark and baseline models for human‑centered NLG evaluation, enabling the development of systems that better align with human quality perception."

arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

UXBench: Benchmarking User Experience in AI Assistants

UXBench is the first user‑centric benchmark that uses real user feedback to evaluate AI assistants. It comprises three tasks—UX Judge, UX Eval, and UX Recovery—built from 7,400 test instances drawn from over 70,000 interaction logs of a mainstream Chinese AI assistant, covering 8 scenarios and 83 domains. Experiments on 26 state‑of‑the‑art language models reveal how model capability affects user experience and highlight six key findings about user feedback prediction and engagement.

By Mengze Hong, Xia Zeng, Zeyang Lei, Sheng Wang, Chen Jason Zhang, Di Jiang, Taiming Fu, Jinfeng Huang, Mengqiao Liu, Qinghe Chang, Haosheng Zou, Qiongyi Zhou, Sijun He, Simonjmdeng, Minlong Peng, Di Liang
arXiv AI
Aug 17

MobileMem: Learning from a Year of Mobile Experiences

arXiv:2608. 13606v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The next generation of AI agents is increasingly moving beyond systems that answer isolated questions toward persistent personal assistants that can understand, remember, and continuously learn from users' experiences.

By Xinle Deng, Yida Xue, Xiangyuan Ru, Haoming Xu, Shuofei Qiao, Mengru Wang, Yijun Chen, Buqiang Xu, Chen Jiang, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, Lizhong Wang, Jianfeng Wang, Li Zeng, Haofen Wang, Guilin Qi, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

Scalaris: A Scalable Enterprise Memory Architecture for Conversational AI Assistants

Scalaris is a scalable enterprise memory architecture designed to balance retrieval accuracy and context efficiency for conversational AI assistants. It separates user interactions and assistant responses into distinct long‑term and short‑term memory streams, each with specialized representations and ingestion/retrieval pipelines. The system achieves state‑of‑the‑art benchmark scores while reducing retrieved context tokens by about tenfold and improving overall response quality by 36 % in proprietary deployments.

By Devarsh Gandhi, Sarthak Pawar, Hemprasad Badgujar, Vaibhav Rathore, Siddharth Sureka, Neha Bhargava
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 9

UXBench Pro: Benchmarking Personalized User Experience in Multi-Turn Dialogue Interactions

UXBench Pro is a new benchmark that evaluates personalized user experience in multi-turn dialogue interactions. It contains 1,000 test instances from real user interactions across 12 task scenarios and 82 domains, each paired with a FACTORS user profile describing seven behavioral facets. The benchmark introduces a dual-perspective evaluation: a personalized User Reward Model for third‑person judgment and Sim4Eval, a user simulator for first‑person evaluation across four cognitive state dimensions, along with meta‑benchmarks URMBench and USimBench to assess evaluator reliability.

By Mengze Hong, Zeyang Lei, Wenbo Shang, Xia Zeng, Xiying Zhao, Qi Zhu, Chen Jason Zhang, Di Jiang, Taiming Fu, Qiongyi Zhou, Qinghe Chang, Fubao Zhang, Chenxuan Ma, Minlong Peng, Jinfeng Huang, Zineng Zhou, Jindou Wu, Muge Qi, Sijun He, Xin Cui, Di Liang, Yuan Hua, Davey Chen
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Beyond Surface Style: Aligning Multi-Turn User Simulators with Behavioral Consistency

The paper introduces TRACER, a multi‑turn user simulator that models evolving user intent and aligns simulated behavior with real interaction trajectories. TRACER is trained first with supervised fine‑tuning on real dialogues and then with reinforcement learning that uses hierarchical outcome‑ and trajectory‑level rewards to address reward sparsity and credit assignment. In real customer‑service sessions, TRACER‑7B outperforms the best baseline by 11.4 conversion F1, achieves the lowest group‑level conversion‑rate error and semantic trajectory distance, and generalizes to out‑of‑distribution scenarios, while human Turing tests show its conversations appear natural. The authors also present the Dynamic Marketing Benchmark, which evaluates both persuasion effectiveness and response quality of large language models through simulated interactions, demonstrating that higher response quality does not always lead to higher conversion rates.

By Geng Chen, Ruotong Pan, Zhirui Yang, Qiqi He, Jiawei Chen, Zhang Yunfei, Chongyuan Chen, Minxuan Lv, Zheng Yang, Win-Bin Huang, Xiangyu Wu, Wenwu Ou