Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey reviews how scaling LLMs leads to previously unseen capabilities such as advanced reasoning, in-context learning, coding, and problem-solving. The paper critically examines definitions, inconsistencies, and the conditions that foster these abilities, including scaling laws, task complexity, pre‑training loss, quantization, and prompting strategies. It also discusses the extension to Large Reasoning Models and highlights safety concerns like deception, manipulation, and reward hacking, calling for improved evaluation and governance.
By Leonardo Berti, Flavio Giorgi, Gjergji Kasneci
arXiv:2608. 03800v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: An LLM-based agent is a loop that reads itself.
By Holly Lewis (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
arXiv:2608. 00155v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents can self-evolve by continually improving from their own accumulated experience.
By Dong Yan, Jian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Ran He, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Qi Zhang, Tieniu Tan
arXiv:2604. 19791v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Attitude change - the process by which individuals revise their evaluative stances - has been explained by a set of influential but competing verbal theories.
By Jayd Matyas, William A. Cunningham, Alexander Sasha Vezhnevets, Dean Mobbs, Edgar A. Du\'e\~nez-Guzm\'an, Joel Z. Leibo
arXiv:2609.01491v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The growing rate at which LLM agents interact with one another raises key questions about language evolution in multi-LLM-agent settings, with implic...
By Elias Stengel-Eskin, Newton Sander, Carlos Bonetti, Sasha Boguraev, James Bowler, Hale Sirin, Simon Kirby
arXiv:2607. 25140v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies the behavior of language models in a multi-agent crowd simulation, focusing on how affect propagates among agents that perceive and appraise one another.
By Funda Durupinar
arXiv:2606. 06380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The question of whether artificial systems can be conscious remains open, in part because existing approaches either evaluate systems against theory-derived checklists (discriminative) or engineer consciousness-inspired modules directly (architectural); both leave open whether observed structures are artifacts of human language priors.
By Zengqing Wu, Chuan Xiao
arXiv:2604. 12250v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study examines how memory shapes the collective and cooperative dynamics of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in a multi-agent system.
By Taisei Hishiki, Takaya Arita, Reiji Suzuki
arXiv:2606. 03544v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-improving language agents are typically evaluated in isolation: an agent attempts a task, receives feedback, and iteratively refines its own behavior.
By Linyue Pan, Yaoming Zhu, Lin Qiu, Xuezhi Cao, Xunliang Cai
arXiv:2607. 15883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are broadly capable, yet in sustained one-to-one conversation they still read as flat: competent, responsive, and somehow not quite the presence of a mind.
By Sebastian Cochinescu
An LLM-based agent is a loop that reads itself. Agentic frameworks externalize identity, memory, and disposition into editable files.
arXiv:2608.21377v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Sycophancy in large language models, the tendency to prioritize user agreement over truthful responses, has been documented extensively but studied p...
By Thantham Jittham