arXiv:2607. 04983v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This article is about the development of a fuzzy cognitive map using a local large language model.
arXiv:2608. 14152v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have reshaped semantic analysis.
arXiv:2608. 06609v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated item evaluation (AIE) refers to the use of computational methods to assess item quality without requiring manual expert review or field testing of the items under evaluation.
When people share experiences online, they often express thoughts in two ways: a star rating and a written review. In sentiment analysis, ratings are widely used as convenient weak labels for textual sentiment, yet whether the two actually agree is rarely questioned.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have reshaped semantic analysis. Opinion Extraction (OE) for Science and Technology Intelligence (STI) requires concise core opinions from large information streams.
arXiv:2606. 00084v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Online travel platforms generate vast volumes of user-generated hotel reviews, offering rich opportunities to understand traveler experiences at scale.
arXiv:2609.24516v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a popular alternative for evaluation. Often referred to as LLMs as judges (LLJs), these s...
arXiv:2608. 12342v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring the accuracy of financial documents is critical for economic analysis, regulatory compliance, and corporate decision-making.
arXiv:2607. 05761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern data-driven marketing relies on large amounts of consumer data, yet collecting such data can be costly, time-consuming, and difficult to scale.
The paper introduces a knowledge‑graph‑based evaluation framework, S3KG, to assess whether large language models truly understand context in question answering tasks. S3KG combines structural and semantic signals into a single similarity score and is paired with a diagnostic analysis that pinpoints reasoning errors at the triplet level. Across nine benchmarks, the method outperforms existing baselines, achieving up to +7.6 F1 points and an AUROC of 0.973.
arXiv:2606. 23701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Qualitative product feedback can reveal nuanced user experiences, but its implicit sentiment is difficult to measure.
arXiv:2507. 14022v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study proposes the Cognitive Pairwise Comparison Classification Model Selection (CPC-CMS) framework for document-level sentiment analysis.
This scoping review examines 421 studies (2015‑2026) on natural language processing applied to student evaluation of teaching comments. It maps the technical evolution from lexicons and classifiers to transformers and large language models, and evaluates four value dimensions. The review identifies a significant gap between actionable outputs (61.3%) and intended‑user evaluation (11.6%), highlighting limited progress in educational value and robustness.