arXiv Machine Learning August 7, 2026 By Jianfei Li, Kevin Kam Fung Yuen

CPC-CMS: Cognitive Pairwise Comparison Classification Model Selection Framework for Document-level Sentiment Analysis

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2507. 14022v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study proposes the Cognitive Pairwise Comparison Classification Model Selection (CPC-CMS) framework for document-level sentiment analysis.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI

Jun 24

Evaluating LLM Usage for Efficient and Explainable Numerical and Classified Implicit Sentiment Analysis of Product Desirability

arXiv:2606. 23701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Qualitative product feedback can reveal nuanced user experiences, but its implicit sentiment is difficult to measure.

By Sherri Weitl-Harms, John Hastings

llms nlp safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 6

From Financial Sentiment Classification to Return Predictability: A QLoRA Benchmark of Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 04200v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial sentiment classifiers are commonly evaluated against human labels, but strong linguistic performance does not necessarily imply economically useful return predictability.

By Fusheng Luo

llms fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 11

RA-FinBERT: Rule-aware LoRA adaptation for low-resource financial sentiment classification

arXiv:2608. 09834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial sentiment analysis converts unstructured financial news into quantitative signals that can support market analysis and decision-making.

By Fan Zhang, Jiaming Li

llms nlp fine-tuning

arXiv Machine Learning

Sep 24

From Sentiment Classification to Actionable and Responsible Feedback: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map of NLP in Student Evaluation of Teaching, 2015-2026

This scoping review examines 421 studies (2015‑2026) on natural language processing applied to student evaluation of teaching comments. It maps the technical evolution from lexicons and classifiers to transformers and large language models, and evaluates four value dimensions. The review identifies a significant gap between actionable outputs (61.3%) and intended‑user evaluation (11.6%), highlighting limited progress in educational value and robustness.

By Jeff Eicher, Rafael da Silva

llms nlp safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 9

Improving User Experience with Personalized Review Ranking and Summarization

arXiv:2601. 05261v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Online consumer reviews are important decision-support resources in e-commerce, yet the increasing volume of reviews often creates information overload and makes it difficult for users to identify content that matches their individual preferences.

By Muhammad Jawad Mufti, Omar Hammad, MD. Mahfuzur Rahman

llms nlp

arXiv AI

Jun 4

Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking

arXiv:2606. 04387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sales lead conversion in high-stakes domains (e.

By Chenyu Zhang, Yiwen Liu, Yin Sun, Xinyuan Zhang, Yuji Cao, Junming Jiao, Juyi Qiao

llms benchmarks safety

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

Evaluating LLM Usage for Efficient and Explainable Numerical and Classified Implicit Sentiment Analysis of Product Desirability

From Financial Sentiment Classification to Return Predictability: A QLoRA Benchmark of Large Language Models

RA-FinBERT: Rule-aware LoRA adaptation for low-resource financial sentiment classification

From Sentiment Classification to Actionable and Responsible Feedback: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map of NLP in Student Evaluation of Teaching, 2015-2026

Improving User Experience with Personalized Review Ranking and Summarization

Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking