arXiv:2608. 08408v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Logics of abstraction in computational AI research often push important forms of knowledge and reflection aside: dominant standards of legitimacy separate from lived experience of harm; the goals of work misalign with the practices that operationalize them; and career demands crowd out critical reflection.
By Vyoma Raman, Isabel O. Gallegos, Neha Srivathsa
arXiv:2606. 17887v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) deployment in the workplace is accelerating rapidly.
By Dalia Ali, Maria Jos\'e Rodr\'iguez Vel\'azquez, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Vera Liao, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos
arXiv:2607. 28650v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While industry discourse often emphasizes immediate productivity gains and frames GenAI primarily as a tool for automation, the integration of GenAI into system administration may involve deeper shifts in professional practice that are not yet fully understood.
By Rana Abou Khamis, Hala Assal, Ashraf Matrawy
arXiv:2608. 14565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI safety research has mainly focused on two areas: technical alignment (ensuring AI systems produce human-aligned outputs) and the regulation of generative AI's societal impacts (including unemployment risk and labor market disruption).
By Jaeho Kim, Seokhyun Lee, Jieun Lee, Changhee Lee
arXiv:2608. 08601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To anticipate socio-technical risks from AI agents, organizations need taxonomies to classify them.
By Gabriele La Malfa, Lakmal Meegahapola, Edyta Bogucka, Jie M. Zhang, Michael Luck, Elizabeth Black, Daniele Quercia
arXiv:2606. 01171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) can reproduce and amplify the structural inequities faced by minoritized communities.
By Tijs Portegies, Laureanne Willems, Maaike Harbers, Giovanni Sileno, Roland van Dierendonck, Mayesha Tasnim, Lotte Willemsen, Sennay Ghebreab
arXiv:2606. 10086v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper develops a theory of exploratory adaptation under AI-assisted optimization.
By Balaraju Battu
arXiv:2308. 05201v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based generative AI systems are general-purpose tools capable of augmenting or even automating a wide range of job functions, positioning them to reshape labor market dynamics.
By Jin Liu, Xingchen Xu, Xi Nan, Yongjun Li, Yong Tan
arXiv:2606. 15601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce SCAN -- a human-centric decision-making framework to facilitate learners for effective task allocation with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) based on Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development and Metacognition.
By Fendi Tsim, Alina Gutoreva
arXiv:2606. 14306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current Generative AI (GenAI) interfaces remain largely constrained to chatbox interaction, which can impose high cognitive demands on users and create substantial barriers for people with intellectual disabilities (ID), including prompt formulation difficulties, response overload, and limited mechanisms to assess information reliability.
By Virginia Francisco, Daniel Guasch, Raquel Herv\'as
arXiv:2608. 07500v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Research on human-GenAI collaboration yields conflicting findings: GenAI can enhance creativity yet reduce collective diversity, with uneven benefits across skill levels.
By Yoram M Kalman, Yun Wan
arXiv:2507. 01548v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper explores how older migrants in urban China can record stories that everyday language and design often miss.
By Yunfei Chen, Wen Zhan, Peiyue Lin, Ziqun Hua, Ying Hu