arXiv AI

Reasoning-Enhanced Rare-Event Prediction with Balanced Outcome Correction

arXiv:2601. 16406v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Rare-event prediction is critical in domains such as healthcare, finance, reliability engineering, customer support, aviation safety, where positive outcomes are infrequent yet potentially catastrophic.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Cost-Sensitive Conformal Prediction and Human-in-the-Loop Abstention for Imbalanced High-Stakes Decision Support: A Multi-Domain Benchmark

arXiv:2607. 27143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-stakes decision systems in credit scoring, fraud detection, healthcare, and industrial safety require reliable uncertainty quantification under severe class imbalance and asymmetric error costs.

By Manpreet Singh, Akshatha Srikantha, Shyamal Lakhanpal
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Not All Synthetic Data Are Equal: Expert-Committee Audit Screening for Imbalanced Crash-Injury-Severity Prediction in Automated Driving Systems

The paper introduces Expert-Committee Audit Screening (ECAS), a framework that evaluates the credibility of synthetic minority samples for predicting crash injury severity in automated driving systems. Using real incident data from the NHTSA, ECAS filters generated samples based on label support, boundary separation, committee agreement, and local plausibility, then selects accepted samples via within‑class percentile normalization and Pareto non‑dominated sorting. The best ECAS configuration, combined with normalizing flow augmentation and a TabPFN classifier, outperformed other evidence settings in balanced accuracy, macro‑F1, and minor‑injury recall, and analysis showed ECAS‑accepted samples were better supported by nearby real crashes.

By Zewei Li, Qiaoqiao Ren, Hang Yang, S. C. Wong, Stergios-Aristoteles Mitoulis, Yun Ye
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

A Patient World Model for Early Forecasting of Digital Health Campaign Outcomes: Capabilities and Limits

The paper introduces a compact patient world model that forecasts digital health campaign outcomes by maintaining a latent state per patient and learning exposure‑conditioned dynamics. Evaluated on a large US campaign dataset, the model predicts new‑to‑brand prescription volume with low relative error (2.9% at week‑4 cutoff) compared to much higher errors from baseline classifiers. The study also shows that dense next‑exposure supervision is crucial for accurate forecasts when conversions are rare and highlights limitations in interpreting exposure‑conditioned rollouts causally.

By Yunlong Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 9

TRIAGE: Dialectical Reasoning for Explainable Risk Prediction on Irregularly Sampled Medical Time Series with LLMs

arXiv:2606. 09030v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clinical early warning systems built on electronic health records, in which clinical observations are recorded as irregularly sampled medical time series (ISMTS), must deliver both calibrated risk scores for patient triage and interpretable rationales that clinicians can verify.

By Hyeongwon Jang, Gyouk Chu, Changhun Kim, Joonhyung Park, Hangyul Yoon, Eunho Yang
arXiv AI
Sep 23

Toward Auditable and Calibrated AI for Dementia-Related Crash Severity Prediction: A Selective Deferral Framework to Support Human Review

The paper presents a decision‑aware framework for predicting dementia‑related crash severity that emphasizes auditability and selective deferral. Using 4,781 Texas crash records, the authors evaluate several models—including structured, narrative, fusion, calibrated fusion, BERT‑family, and local large‑language‑model baselines—under a stratified 70/15/15 split. The leakage‑controlled Gemma model achieves the highest macro‑F1 of 0.545, while a calibrated fusion model reaches 0.522 macro‑F1 with an expected calibration error of 0.033; selective deferral further improves performance, raising macro‑F1 to 0.573 at 70% coverage and reducing severity cost to 0.577.

By Gaurab Chhetri, Anika Baitullah, Subasish Das