arXiv Computation and Language

When Charts Deceive Web Agents: A Paired Benchmark for Misleading Visualization-Grounded Tasks

The paper introduces MisVisAgentBench, a paired benchmark with 280 task instances that compare clean versus misleading chart evidence for web agents. It evaluates how deceptive visualizations affect agent execution, providing a diagnostic framework to separate misleading-induced failures from baseline difficulty. Results show that misleading charts reduce task success by over 34 percentage points and tend to redirect agents toward targeted misleading actions.

arXiv AI
Jul 28

Chart Deception in Vision-Language Models: From Vulnerability to Mitigation

arXiv:2607. 22600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information visualizations are widely used to communicate patterns, trends, and outliers, yet deceptive design choices-such as truncated or inverted axes, distorted aspect ratios, inappropriate encodings, and misleading color mappings-can systematically alter interpretation while preserving the underlying data.

By Ridwan Mahbub, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mizanur Rahman, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Enamul Hoque
arXiv AI
Jul 15

Navigating the Mirage: A Dual-Path Agentic Framework for Robust Misleading Chart Question Answering

arXiv:2603. 28583v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations.

By Yanjie Zhang, Yafei Li, Rui Sheng, Zixin Chen, Yanna Lin, Huamin Qu, Lei Chen, Yushi Sun
arXiv AI
Aug 11

CAP: A Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-Site Browser Agents with Complex Actions and Perception

arXiv:2608. 08392v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that interact with the web through browsers.

By Zejun Xu, Taiyi Chen, Jin Li, Yongtong Gu, Qi Cheng, Aixuan Lv, Shuai Zhu, Pengfei Zhu, Kaichen Yang, Boyu Sun, Yixian Yang, Mulong Xie, Xin Liu, Dagang Li, Xiaoteng Ma, Hongru Wang
arXiv AI
1d ago

ScamWorld: An Interactive Environment for Evaluating Web Agents Against Online Fraud

ScamWorld is an interactive environment that recreates reported scam websites across various scenarios, fraud mechanisms, and languages, allowing researchers to observe fraud indicators before a web agent’s final action. The platform enables controlled, repeatable evaluation of web agents, which are increasingly used to browse, shop, and manage accounts on the open web. A study of six leading LLM-powered agents revealed deception rates between 11% and 35%, with agents more likely to proceed with payments than to provide credentials or wallet information, and some agents continuing after recognizing suspicious conditions.

By Yutao Wu, Xiao Liu, Ming Wen, Hanxun Huang, Jun Wang, Xingjun Ma
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation

ChartAttack is a framework that evaluates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can be misled by design misleaders to produce charts that cause incorrect interpretations. The authors also present AttackViz, a chart question‑answering dataset that labels effective misleaders and their induced wrong answers. Experiments show that ChartAttack can reduce MLLM QA accuracy by 17.2 points in‑domain and 11.9 points cross‑domain, and that fine‑tuning on AttackViz improves robustness to misleading charts.

By Jesus-German Ortiz-Barajas, Jonathan Tonglet, Vivek Gupta, Iryna Gurevych
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Towards a Unified Misuse Monitoring Benchmark

The paper introduces a unified framework for monitoring misuse of large language model agents in multi‑actor settings, focusing on two attack types: decomposition attacks and prompt injection attacks. It proposes tracking the agent’s externalised actions and determining whether the first detection of harm falls within a defined harm window. Using this formalism, the authors build a benchmark of about 6,200 conversation transcripts and evaluate 17 monitor configurations, finding that action‑framed monitors perform well on both threats while content‑framed monitors struggle with injection attacks, and highlighting limitations of traditional position‑blind metrics.

By Aniruddh Pramod, James Oldfield, Adel Bibi
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

False Claims, Credible Images: A Red-Teaming Benchmark for Commercial Image Generators

The paper introduces EpiReal-Bench, a benchmark of 10,000 false-claim prompts and corresponding images designed to test visual misinformation risks in commercial image generators. It also presents EpiReal-Attack, a black-box optimization framework that can bypass alignment safeguards, increasing the success rate of generating misleading images from 70% to 95%. Experiments on four commercial models show that these generators can produce credible visual evidence for false claims, highlighting a blind spot in current alignment methods.

By Zeyu Ye, Yanchun Li, Sibei He, Meng Xie, Hangtao Zhang, Xianlong Wang, Li Zeng, Jiahao Chen, Yichen Wang, Junhui Wang, Ziqi Zhou