arXiv:2603. 28583v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations.
arXiv:2607. 22600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information visualizations are widely used to communicate patterns, trends, and outliers, yet deceptive design choices-such as truncated or inverted axes, distorted aspect ratios, inappropriate encodings, and misleading color mappings-can systematically alter interpretation while preserving the underlying data.
arXiv:2510. 04514v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent multimodal LLMs have shown promise in chart-based visual question answering, but their performance declines sharply on unannotated charts-those requiring precise visual interpretation rather than relying on textual shortcuts.
arXiv:2604. 02794v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Charts are ubiquitous in scientific and financial literature for presenting structured data.
arXiv:2609.01383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic...
The paper introduces CAIT, a benchmark of 400 synthetic scenes featuring counter‑intuitive actions that challenge multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Human participants and proprietary models like Claude and Gemini perform well, but standard open‑source instruction‑tuned MLLMs fail, largely due to a strong language prior that overrides contradictory visual evidence. The study shows that Chain‑of‑Thought reasoning can help but introduces new issues, while targeted fine‑tuning and structured prompting can reduce reliance on language priors and improve visual grounding.
arXiv:2606. 03348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility.
The paper introduces Illusion-Reasoning, a benchmark that uses real-world visual illusion images paired with annotated question-answer pairs to evaluate Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs). It argues that current evaluations focus too narrowly on perception or specific domains, and that a joint assessment of perception and reasoning in open-world settings is lacking. Using this benchmark, the authors demonstrate that many LVLMs’ reasoning abilities are less advanced than previously claimed, offering new insights and directions for optimization.
arXiv:2608. 16259v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid progress of image generation models calls for AI-generated image (AIGI) detectors that are not only accurate but also explainable and reliable.
arXiv:2608.24535v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data visualizations are widely used for communicating information, but they are also vulnerable to intentional manipulations that induce misleading int...
ChartAttack is a framework that evaluates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can be misled by design misleaders to produce charts that cause incorrect interpretations. The authors also present AttackViz, a chart question‑answering dataset that labels effective misleaders and their induced wrong answers. Experiments show that ChartAttack can reduce MLLM QA accuracy by 17.2 points in‑domain and 11.9 points cross‑domain, and that fine‑tuning on AttackViz improves robustness to misleading charts.
Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic, requiring the active interrogation of interacti...
arXiv:2607. 11560v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language agents (VLAs) are increasingly used to interpret complex driving scenes and support safety-critical reasoning.