arXiv AI By Ridwan Mahbub, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mizanur Rahman, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Enamul Hoque

Chart Deception in Vision-Language Models: From Vulnerability to Mitigation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 22600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information visualizations are widely used to communicate patterns, trends, and outliers, yet deceptive design choices-such as truncated or inverted axes, distorted aspect ratios, inappropriate encodings, and misleading color mappings-can systematically alter interpretation while preserving the underlying data.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 15

Navigating the Mirage: A Dual-Path Agentic Framework for Robust Misleading Chart Question Answering

arXiv:2603. 28583v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations.

By Yanjie Zhang, Yafei Li, Rui Sheng, Zixin Chen, Yanna Lin, Huamin Qu, Lei Chen, Yushi Sun
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Same Chart, Different Story: Bias in Vision-Language Chart Interpretation

The paper introduces ChartBias, a benchmark of 820 real-world charts covering six social attributes, designed to audit bias in vision‑language models (VLMs) that interpret charts. Across 12 VLMs, the study identifies three failure modes—narrative shift, group hallucination, and preference polarity—where models produce different or misleading narratives when the referenced social group changes. A multi‑agent mitigation framework is proposed, separating evidence extraction from group‑conditioned generation and using a counterfactual judge, which reduces narrative shift while maintaining chart‑grounded reasoning.

By Mizanur Rahman, Huan Wu, Arash Asgari, Enamul Hoque Prince, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation

ChartAttack is a framework that evaluates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can be misled by design misleaders to produce charts that cause incorrect interpretations. The authors also present AttackViz, a chart question‑answering dataset that labels effective misleaders and their induced wrong answers. Experiments show that ChartAttack can reduce MLLM QA accuracy by 17.2 points in‑domain and 11.9 points cross‑domain, and that fine‑tuning on AttackViz improves robustness to misleading charts.

By Jesus-German Ortiz-Barajas, Jonathan Tonglet, Vivek Gupta, Iryna Gurevych