arXiv Computer Vision
VizAnchor: Decoding Manipulation Intent from Tampering Visualizations via Dual-Anchor Reasoning
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Chart Deception in Vision-Language Models: From Vulnerability to Mitigation
arXiv:2607. 22600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information visualizations are widely used to communicate patterns, trends, and outliers, yet deceptive design choices-such as truncated or inverted axes, distorted aspect ratios, inappropriate encodings, and misleading color mappings-can systematically alter interpretation while preserving the underlying data.
arXiv AI
Jul 15
Navigating the Mirage: A Dual-Path Agentic Framework for Robust Misleading Chart Question Answering
arXiv:2603. 28583v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations.
arXiv AI
Sep 12
Exploring Multimodal Prompt for Visualization Authoring with Large Language Models
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) interpret ambiguous or incomplete text prompts for visualization authoring and introduces visual prompts as a complementary modality to improve precision. An empirical study informs the design of VisPilot, a system that allows users to create visualizations using text, sketches, and direct manipulation. A controlled user study and expert evaluation show that multimodal prompts help users convey spatial constraints, local references, and design preferences while maintaining task efficiency comparable to text-only prompting.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2
InSight: A Benchmark for Agentic Claim Verification in Interactive Visualizations
arXiv:2609.01383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic...
arXiv AI
Jul 29
Chart-Supported or Model-Supplied? Examining MLLM-Generated Claims for Accessible Visualization
arXiv:2607. 25021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can connect visualization patterns to external causes, consequences, and domain knowledge, but the evidential basis of these interpretations is often unclear.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3
ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation
ChartAttack is a framework that evaluates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can be misled by design misleaders to produce charts that cause incorrect interpretations. The authors also present AttackViz, a chart question‑answering dataset that labels effective misleaders and their induced wrong answers. Experiments show that ChartAttack can reduce MLLM QA accuracy by 17.2 points in‑domain and 11.9 points cross‑domain, and that fine‑tuning on AttackViz improves robustness to misleading charts.