arXiv Computation and Language

IndicTriMix: Developing Language Identification Datasets and Models for Tri-Language Code-Mixing

IndicTriMix presents a new benchmark and models for token‑level language identification in tri‑language code‑mixed text involving Hindi, Gujarati, and Bengali. The authors reformulate the task as sequence labeling and fine‑tune transformer models MuRIL and XLM‑RoBERTa, evaluating them on manually annotated test sets. They also introduce two code‑mixing generation methods using parallel sentences and release the datasets and fine‑tuned models for public use.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

IndicDetect: Evaluating Cross-Lingual LLM-Generated Text Detection for Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil

IndicDetect is a benchmark for evaluating AI‑generated text detection in Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil. It pairs curated human‑written texts with LLM‑generated counterparts across multiple domains and generators, testing detectors under domain shift, generator shift, and adversarial perturbation. The study shows that supervised neural detectors fail to generalize to unseen generators and attacks, with Hindi experiencing the greatest degradation, indicating that robustness—not peak accuracy—is the main weakness in Indic language detectors.

By Bhaskar Ganesh Devalla, Junchao Wu, Nilesh Dokuparthi, Greeshma Yaluru, Tatiana Muniz Rodriguez, Lidia S. Chao, Derek F. Wong
arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

What Language is This? Ask Your Tokenizer

The paper introduces UniLID, a lightweight language identification method that uses the UnigramLM tokenization algorithm to predict a string’s language by evaluating which language’s unigram distribution best explains the text. UniLID is data‑ and compute‑efficient, allows incremental addition of new languages without retraining, and can be integrated into existing tokenization pipelines. Experiments show competitive performance against baselines such as fasttext, GlotLID‑M, and CLD3, achieving 69% accuracy with five labeled samples per language and 89% with 25, and delivering significant gains on fine‑grained dialect identification.

By Clara Meister, Ahmetcan Yavuz, Pietro Lesci, Tiago Pimentel
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 16

Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality

Large Language Models (LLMs) perform differently on identical programming tasks when prompted in different natural languages, a phenomenon known as language bias. While this behavior has been widely studied for general text generation, its impact on code generation quality and programming conventions remains largely unexplored.

arXiv AI
Jul 17

Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality

arXiv:2607. 14816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) perform differently on identical programming tasks when prompted in different natural languages, a phenomenon known as language bias.

By Saima Afrin, Alessandro Midolo, Camilo Escobar-Vel\'asquez, Mario Linares-V\'asquez, Weiyuan Ding, Bowen Xu, Massimiliano Di Penta, Antonio Mastropaolo
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28

IndicTalk: A Large-Scale Persona-Based Multilingual Conversational Corpus for Indic Languages

arXiv:2607. 23242v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed conversational AI, yet high-quality multilingual code-mixed dialogue resources remain scarce, particularly for Indic languages where speakers naturally alternate between English and their native language in both native-script and Romanized forms.

By Sahil Deepak Gawande, Mayank Singh
arXiv AI
Aug 20

NE-BERT: A Multilingual Language Model for Nine Northeast Indian Languages

NE‑BERT is a multilingual encoder trained on about 8.3 million sentences from nine Northeast Indian languages plus Hindi and English. Using weighted sampling and a custom SentencePiece tokenizer, it achieves significantly lower perplexity than IndicBERT‑V2, MuRIL, and mBERT, and improves tokenization fertility. The model also addresses vocabulary fragmentation in extremely low‑resource languages through aggressive upsampling, and its effectiveness is validated on part‑of‑speech tagging for three of the languages.

By Badal Nyalang
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

Improving Cross-Lingual Token Representations by Adding a Pinch of SALT

The paper introduces SALT, a lightweight post‑training technique that injects span‑level supervision into existing cross‑lingual sentence encoders to enhance token representations. Evaluated on five multilingual token‑level benchmarks, SALT achieves the best overall results on four tasks, surpassing alternative fine‑tuning methods and competitive encoders. Additionally, SALT improves sentence‑level performance on cross‑lingual retrieval and classification tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of span‑level supervision for both token and sentence representations.

By Guillem Ram\'irez
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

Latent Mechanisms of Language Control in Multilingual Language Models

The paper investigates how multilingual large language models can unintentionally switch languages during generation. It compares three techniques—ValSel, FreqSel, and AnnSel—for pinpointing latent variables that control language choice in cross‑layer transcoders. Using new multilingual benchmarks and targeted interventions on Gemma‑2‑2B and Qwen3‑4B, the study finds all methods can steer output language, with FreqSel performing best and AnnSel providing interpretable selections via explicit annotations.

By Ryo Mitsuhashi, Sabri Boughorbel, Majd Hawasly
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation

The paper investigates how to fairly compare language models across languages, noting that current evaluation methods vary widely and lack empirical validation. By training controlled monolingual models on parallel data and testing multilingual LLMs, the authors find that many normalized metrics suffer from biases due to tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. Instead, they recommend using sentence‑level negative log‑likelihood over semantically equivalent sequences for more reliable cross‑lingual comparisons.

By Xiulin Yang, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Catherine Arnett