arXiv:2607. 28125v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Numerous unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) algorithms exist, but for clinical practice, selecting the best-suited one along with proper hyperparameters often remains unclear, as the unlabeled deployment (target) domain prevents direct evaluation.
By Yiheng Xiong, Luisa Gall\'ee, Daniel Santak Wolf, Heiko Hillenhagen, Michael G\"otz
arXiv:2608. 12035v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) in clinical practice requires choosing which algorithm to use and which of its trained models to ship.
By Yiheng Xiong, Luisa Gall\'ee, Daniel Santak Wolf, Heiko Hillenhagen, Michael G\"otz
The paper introduces a label‑free method called AURCC for selecting the best foundational model for medical image classification when the target domain lacks labels. AURCC uses a pseudo‑label discrepancy computed by the SUDO framework to score models without fine‑tuning. Experiments on chest X‑ray data across three inter‑hospital shifts show that AURCC closely matches the true model ranking, outperforming simple source‑accuracy baselines especially when source data are limited.
By Juan I\~naki Larrea, Lucas Mansilla, Enzo Ferrante
arXiv:2601.17228v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Deep learning models in computational pathology often fail to generalize across cohorts and institutions due to domain shift. Existing approaches e...
By Tengyue Zhang, Ruiwen Ding, Luoting Zhuang, Yuxiao Wu, Erika F. Rodriguez, William Hsu
In high-stakes healthcare applications, machine learning models are frequently trained on data from one patient population and deployed on another, creating a distribution shift that degrades both acc...
arXiv:2607. 26333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment.
By Panagiotis Fytas, Ian Selby, Clemens Karner, Judith Babar, Simon Baker, Jake Beckford, Timothy J. Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, John Li Chen, Alex Sawer, Michael Roberts, Jonathan Weir-McCall, J. H. F. Rudd, Carola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, Anna Korhonen, Anna Breger
Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have shown strong performance in breast cancer diagnosis, particularly for classification tasks in mammography. However, domain shifts across multi-site datasets remain a challenge, especially when models are applied to unseen domains.
arXiv:2608.29944v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critical task for diagnosis and treatment planning. Despite the success of deep learn...
By Henrique Zan Grande, Jo\~ao G. Pitol, Lucas B. Schuck, Rafael V. Serenato, Rayson Laroca, Andre Gustavo Hochuli
arXiv:2608. 03511v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active learning (AL) promises to reduce the cost of medical imaging projects by lowering the number of clinical labels required.
By Julia Machnio, Mads Nielsen, Mostafa Mehdipour Ghazi
arXiv:2606. 04665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep unsupervised domain adaptation (Deep UDA) methods successfully leverage rich labeled data in a source domain to boost the performance on related but unlabeled data in a target domain.
By Kaichao You, Ximei Wang, Mingsheng Long, Michael I. Jordan
arXiv:2608.22532v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Domain shift across imaging modalities and acquisition sites remains a significant barrier to the clinical deployment of segmentation models. Source-fr...
By Tal Grossman, Noa Cahan, Hayit Greenspan
Deep unsupervised domain adaptation (Deep UDA) methods successfully leverage rich labeled data in a source domain to boost the performance on related but unlabeled data in a target domain. However, algorithm comparison is cumbersome in Deep UDA due to the absence of accurate and standardized model selection method, posing an obstacle to further advances in the field.