arXiv:2608. 12035v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) in clinical practice requires choosing which algorithm to use and which of its trained models to ship.
By Yiheng Xiong, Luisa Gall\'ee, Daniel Santak Wolf, Heiko Hillenhagen, Michael G\"otz
Numerous unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) algori-thms exist, but for clinical practice, selecting the best-suited one along with proper hyperparameters often remains unclear, as the unlabeled deployment (target) domain prevents direct evaluation. We propose a label-free criterion that jointly selects the algorithm and hyperparameters for UDA.
arXiv:2607. 28125v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Numerous unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) algorithms exist, but for clinical practice, selecting the best-suited one along with proper hyperparameters often remains unclear, as the unlabeled deployment (target) domain prevents direct evaluation.
By Yiheng Xiong, Luisa Gall\'ee, Daniel Santak Wolf, Heiko Hillenhagen, Michael G\"otz
The paper introduces Joint Distribution Alignment for Universal Domain Adaptation (JAUA), a new algorithm designed for scenarios where source and target domains have differing label spaces. It provides a theoretical upper bound on generalization error for Universal Domain Adaptation and proposes aligning joint distributions using Chi‑Square divergence, complemented by a progressive pseudo‑labeling strategy. Experiments on six public image datasets show JAUA outperforms existing methods in handling Universal Domain Adaptation challenges.
By Shizhe Li, Hongshan Pu, Mengying Xie, Yi Xiang, Xiaowei Yang
With growing privacy and portability concerns, source-free domain adaptation requires only a source pre-trained model and an unlabeled target domain, allowing for effective adaptation to the target data. Most existing self-training methods focus on selecting and exploiting samples with reliable predictions, often neglecting others.
arXiv:2606. 07630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world datasets across image and text domains are often characterized by skewed class distributions and noisy annotations, which jointly degrade model performance, particularly on minority classes.
By Jiancheng Zhang, Meiqing Li, Qi Zhang, Yinglun Zhu
arXiv:2407. 21311v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to mitigate domain shift, where the distribution of labeled source data differs from that of unlabeled target data.
By Ali Abedi, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, Ning Zhang, Farhad Pourpanah
In high-stakes healthcare applications, machine learning models are frequently trained on data from one patient population and deployed on another, creating a distribution shift that degrades both acc...
arXiv:2603.12468v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Under strong cross-domain shifts, weakly supervised object localization (WSOL) models often lose their capacity to discriminate and develop a stron...
By Alexis Guichemerre, Banafsheh Karimian, Soufiane Belharbi, Natacha Gillet, Nicolas Thome, Pourya Shamsolmoali, Mohammadhadi Shateri, Luke McCaffrey, Eric Granger
The paper introduces ACES, a structured sampling framework for implicit neural representations that separates coverage from importance. ACES builds adaptive spatial partitions to ensure domain coverage and reduce redundant sampling, while applying region-level importance weighting to focus on informative areas. The authors provide theoretical analysis showing reduced gradient variance and potential optimization gains, and demonstrate faster convergence and lower error on scientific field learning tasks compared to uniform and pointwise adaptive sampling.
By Guang Zhao, Xihaier Luo, Huan-Hsin Tseng, Seungjun Lee, Shinjae Yoo, Yihui Ren, Wei Xu
arXiv:2606. 23758v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Domain generalization learns from multiple source domains to generalize to unseen target domains.
By Xiran Wang, Jian Zhang, Lei Qi, Yang Gao, Yinghuan Shi
SPARCL (Spatially Adaptive Regional Coverage for Active Learning) is a new active learning strategy for chest X‑ray lesion segmentation that balances predictive uncertainty with spatial coverage using a concave coverage function. It directs annotation effort toward under‑labeled regions, reverts to standard uncertainty sampling when spatial variation is absent, and guarantees near‑optimal greedy batch selection through a monotone submodular objective. The authors also propose Spatial Inconsistency and Performance Coverage metrics to reveal regional fairness, and demonstrate that SPARCL achieves 95% of fully supervised performance using only 24% of the data versus 29% for the best baseline.
By Juho Jung, Seongjae Kang, Mijoo Kim, Sungduk Cho, Yunkyoung Jun, Sunghoon Joo, Yoona Hwang