arXiv:2607. 04710v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inducing cooperation among distributed agents is still a difficult problem in the field of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), particularly in social dilemma situations.
By Yu Wei, Yukiko Ogura, Yoshiyuki Ohmura, Ildefons Magrans de Abril, Hoshinori Kanazawa, Yasuo Kuniyoshi
arXiv:2604. 15267v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: It is increasingly important that LLM agents interact effectively and safely with other goal-pursuing agents, yet, recent works report the opposite trend: LLMs with stronger reasoning capabilities behave _less_ cooperatively in mixed-motive games such as the prisoner's dilemma and public goods settings.
By Emanuel Tewolde, Xiao Zhang, David Guzman Piedrahita, Vincent Conitzer, Zhijing Jin
arXiv:2606. 11284v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world multi-agent systems, from traffic coordination to resource allocation, are often modeled as general-sum games where individual incentives conflict with collective welfare.
By Wongyu Lee, Francesco Lelli, Omran Ayoub, Massimo Tornatore
arXiv:2608. 08604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a powerful framework for solving complex collaborative tasks, but it relies heavily on well-defined global reward functions.
By Ni Mu, Yao Luan, Yiqin Yang, Qing-Shan Jia
arXiv:2606. 14693v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cooperative multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL) models team decision making under multiple, potentially conflicting objectives.
By Pengxin Wang, Lihao Guo, Yi Xie, Bo Liu, Siyang Cao, Jingdi Chen
arXiv:2608. 12125v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM-based agents with user-instructed goals are becoming widely deployed, they increasingly encounter each other in strategic interactions, and face challenges of finding mutually beneficial outcomes.
By Akash Kundu, Emanuel Tewolde, Ratip Emin Berker, Samuel F. Brown, Vincent Conitzer
arXiv:2511. 02304v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study learning multi-task, multi-agent policies for cooperative, temporal objectives, under centralized training, decentralized execution.
By Beyazit Yalcinkaya, Marcell Vazquez-Chanlatte, Ameesh Shah, Hanna Krasowski, Sanjit A. Seshia
arXiv:2608. 10126v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aggregates heterogeneous preferences into a single reward model, assuming preference homogeneity.
By M P V S Gopinadh, Karthik Kamuju, Kummari Avinash, John Joshua, Srinivasa Raju Rudraraju
arXiv:2608. 04663v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning often adds social terms to individual rewards, yet the scale of those terms is usually chosen by hand.
By Aaditya Mehta, Arya Shah
arXiv:2603. 05789v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Repeated multi-agent interactions require evaluation metrics that capture not only payoff distributions but also their temporal organization.
By Nikolaos Al. Papadopoulos, Ismael Tito Freire, Marti Sanchez-Fibla, Konstantinos E. Psannis
arXiv:2606. 04750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Instilling virtuous behavior in artificial intelligence has seen increasing interest.
By Ajay Vishwanath, Christian Omlin
arXiv:2601. 21523v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: To promote cooperation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning, the reward signals of all agents can be aggregated together, forming global rewards that are commonly known as the fully cooperative setting.
By Bang Giang Le, Viet Cuong Ta