arXiv AI

Interpretable Difficulty-Aware Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues

The paper introduces an interpretable, difficulty-aware knowledge tracing framework for tutor‑student dialogues that leverages large language models. It explicitly models student ability and question difficulty at each turn, using the original question text and the next tutor‑posed task to estimate knowledge state. By integrating Item Response Theory, the framework translates LLM outputs into cognitive‑theory‑based parameters, achieving superior performance over existing baselines while producing interpretable predictions.

arXiv AI
Sep 17

Enhancing knowledge tracing robustness for new question cold start in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

The paper introduces Practical Integrated Cross-consistent Knowledge Tracing (PICKT), a model that incorporates multiple feature types to improve Knowledge Tracing robustness when new questions lack interaction history. It evaluates the impact of difficulty, textual, and knowledge‑map relational features, finding that difficulty is especially informative for hard questions, while fused text and map features help estimate unseen questions by leveraging similar ones seen during training. The study concludes that prioritizing feature annotation aligned with educational service characteristics is essential for maintaining robust diagnostics in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

By Wonbeen Lee, Channyoung Lee, Junho Sohn, Hansam Cho
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

LLM Pedagogical Behavior in AI Tutoring Interactions

arXiv:2608.22993v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Students increasingly use LLMs as tutors for coursework and problem solving. Little is known about the level of assistance LLMs provide when students u...

By Suhyeon Lee, Juneha Baek, Jaehyeong Park, Donghyuk Shin
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

EduDial: Constructing a Large-scale Multi-turn Teacher-Student Dialogue Corpus

EduDial is a large-scale multi-turn teacher‑student dialogue corpus covering 345 core knowledge points and 34,250 dialogue sessions, designed around Bloom’s taxonomy and ten questioning strategies such as situational, ZPD, and metacognitive questioning. The dataset includes differentiated teaching strategies for students at varying cognitive levels to provide targeted guidance. Using EduDial, the authors trained EduDial‑LLM 32B and introduced an 11‑dimensional evaluation framework that measures teaching quality and content quality, showing that most mainstream LLMs struggle with student‑centered teaching while EduDial‑LLM outperforms all baselines across all metrics.

By Shouang Wei, Min Zhang, Xin Lin, Bo Jiang, Zhongxiang Dai, Kun Kuang
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Response-free item difficulty modelling for multiple-choice items with fine-tuned transformers: Component-wise representation and multi-task learning

The paper proposes a response‑free method for estimating difficulty of reading‑comprehension multiple‑choice items by fine‑tuning a transformer on item wording. It introduces two extensions to a baseline joint‑encoding model: a component‑wise variant that encodes passage, question, and options separately, and a multi‑task variant that adds a question‑answering auxiliary task. Experiments on a corpus of nearly 30,000 items show that both extensions outperform the baseline, especially the multi‑task variant across all metrics and the component‑wise variant in rank ordering, even with limited training data.

By Jan Net\'ik, Patr\'icia Martinkov\'a
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

TutorCaseBench: A Case-Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Tutors in Supporting Students with Challenging Behaviors

TutorCaseBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate large language model (LLM) tutors on their ability to support students exhibiting challenging behaviors. It is built from qualitative case studies in pedagogy, educational psychology, and special education, converting documented student categories into 923 case-specific dialogues and rubrics. The benchmark tests 11 state‑of‑the‑art LLMs on open‑ended response generation and multiple‑choice selection, finding that even the best model meets rubric criteria only 55.8% of the time for open‑ended cases, highlighting a gap between recognizing interventions and adapting to context.

By Yeon Su Park, Chanyoung Park, Tae Soo Kim, Seungju Kim, Hyunwoo Kim, Daho Jung, Jinsung Yoon, Juho Kim