arXiv Machine Learning

What Moved the Alarm Score? Causal Attribution with Exact Computation and Scarce-Incident Estimation

The paper introduces a method for attributing changes in alarm scores in industrial and scientific systems by modeling the problem as a Shapley game over hybrid structural causal models. It distinguishes between changes in structural functions and exogenous laws, providing a detailed, function/law-resolved explanation of how each type of change propagates to the alarm score. For ordered linear SCMs and quadratic scores, the authors present a polynomial‑time exact computation of the full Shapley vector and, for scarce incident data, a cross‑fitted estimation approach with error bounds and top‑k recovery guarantees, validated through experiments on controlled and real shifts.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 31

DoTime: A Synthetic Benchmark Generator for Interventional and Counterfactual Time Series

arXiv:2607. 27263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most benchmarks for causal inference over time series are observational, small, or domain-specific, leaving interventional and counterfactual estimation under-served exactly where it matters most, such as in healthcare, policy evaluation, and climate science.

By Dennis Thumm, Billy Tim Anthony, Ying Chen
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Structural Causal Bottleneck Models

The paper introduces Structural Causal Bottleneck Models (SCBMs), a new class of structural causal models where high‑dimensional causal effects are mediated by low‑dimensional bottleneck variables. SCBMs allow mechanism‑specific, target‑dependent dimensionality reduction while remaining estimable with standard learning algorithms. The authors prove that bottleneck variables are identifiable up to bijection from observational data, and demonstrate experimentally that using bottlenecks improves identification and finite‑sample efficiency in causal effect estimation for instrumental variables, mediation, and backdoor adjustment.

By Simon Bing, Jonas Wahl, Jakob Runge
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Causal Attribution for Agentic Decisions: Estimators, Coupling, and a Traceability Specification

The paper presents a framework for causal attribution in agentic AI systems, outlining estimators and conditions where they fail. It distinguishes between marginal total effects and common‑random‑number total effects, introduces a natural direct effect under pinned downstreams, and derives a coupling method to keep direct effects estimable. The authors also propose a traceability specification to meet upcoming regulatory requirements for high‑risk AI systems.

By Ajay Pravin Mahale (Hochschule Trier)
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 10

From Observation to Intervention: A Causal Audit of Expert Importance in Mixture-of-Experts Models

arXiv:2606. 10703v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretability methods routinely use population-level summary statistics over observed model behaviour to license claims about the effects of targeted interventions on specific computations; in Pearl's terms, they treat rung-1 associational evidence as if it supported rung-2 interventional conclusions, a move whose validity is rarely tested.

By Leonard Engmann, Christian Medeiros Adriano, Holger Giese
arXiv Statistics ML
Oct 5

Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model

The paper introduces new one‑step and targeted minimum loss‑based estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under the front‑door criterion. These estimators use multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, can avoid modeling the mediator density, and are compatible with flexible machine‑learning nuisance estimation. The authors derive conditions for root‑n consistency, asymptotic linearity, and develop doubly robust tests for identification assumptions, demonstrating improved efficiency and favorable performance in simulations and real‑world applications in education and emergency medicine.

By Anna Guo, David Benkeser, Razieh Nabi