arXiv:2606. 08275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When an LLM agent fails -- issues a refund it should not have, calls the wrong tool, leaks data -- existing tooling answers what happened (observability) or whether it passed (evaluation), but not which step caused the failure.
By Jaineet Shah
arXiv:2607. 27263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most benchmarks for causal inference over time series are observational, small, or domain-specific, leaving interventional and counterfactual estimation under-served exactly where it matters most, such as in healthcare, policy evaluation, and climate science.
By Dennis Thumm, Billy Tim Anthony, Ying Chen
arXiv:2610.28803v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While statistical learning has made remarkable progress in recent decades, driven by large datasets and data-driven protocols that have transformed sci...
By Isacco Beretta
arXiv:2608. 12555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predictive explanation methods attribute a model output; they do not, by themselves, attribute an intervention effect on the real-world outcome.
By Michael Georgiades, Charalambia Varnava
arXiv:2607. 14940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study causal inference under outcome interference for sequential, observational settings.
By Phevos Paschalidis, Constantinos Daskalakis, Devavrat Shah
arXiv:2609.36881v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Causal foundation models (CFMs) pre-trained on data generated from various structural causal models (SCMs) have been proposed for estimating causal eff...
By Heejin Jung, Gyeongdeok Seo, Hoyoon Byun, Joseph Lee, Kyungwoo Song
The paper introduces Structural Causal Bottleneck Models (SCBMs), a new class of structural causal models where high‑dimensional causal effects are mediated by low‑dimensional bottleneck variables. SCBMs allow mechanism‑specific, target‑dependent dimensionality reduction while remaining estimable with standard learning algorithms. The authors prove that bottleneck variables are identifiable up to bijection from observational data, and demonstrate experimentally that using bottlenecks improves identification and finite‑sample efficiency in causal effect estimation for instrumental variables, mediation, and backdoor adjustment.
By Simon Bing, Jonas Wahl, Jakob Runge
The paper presents a framework for causal attribution in agentic AI systems, outlining estimators and conditions where they fail. It distinguishes between marginal total effects and common‑random‑number total effects, introduces a natural direct effect under pinned downstreams, and derives a coupling method to keep direct effects estimable. The authors also propose a traceability specification to meet upcoming regulatory requirements for high‑risk AI systems.
By Ajay Pravin Mahale (Hochschule Trier)
arXiv:2606. 10703v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretability methods routinely use population-level summary statistics over observed model behaviour to license claims about the effects of targeted interventions on specific computations; in Pearl's terms, they treat rung-1 associational evidence as if it supported rung-2 interventional conclusions, a move whose validity is rarely tested.
By Leonard Engmann, Christian Medeiros Adriano, Holger Giese
arXiv:2609.36771v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a critical problem in many real-world scenarios. RCA enables the identification of faulty or failing mechanisms in a sys...
By Md Musfiqur Rahman, Kenneth Lee, Ziwei Jiang, Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Ruocheng Guo, Murat Kocaoglu
arXiv:2610.00424v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Knowing how much a causal predictor could improve need not reveal the gain of the repair actually learned. We quantify this gap in a scalar Gaussian...
By Qinchuan Cheng, Jiaqi Liu, Ruixuan Xie
The paper introduces new one‑step and targeted minimum loss‑based estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under the front‑door criterion. These estimators use multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, can avoid modeling the mediator density, and are compatible with flexible machine‑learning nuisance estimation. The authors derive conditions for root‑n consistency, asymptotic linearity, and develop doubly robust tests for identification assumptions, demonstrating improved efficiency and favorable performance in simulations and real‑world applications in education and emergency medicine.
By Anna Guo, David Benkeser, Razieh Nabi