arXiv:2507.05134v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We present a deep learning approach to extract physical parameters (e.g., mobility, Schottky contact barrier height, defect profiles) of two-dimens...
By Robert K. A. Bennett, Jan-Lucas Uslu, Harmon F. Gault, Asir Intisar Khan, Lauren Hoang, Tara Pe\~na, Kathryn Neilson, Young Suh Song, Zhepeng Zhang, Andrew J. Mannix, Eric Pop
arXiv:2606. 24046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work presents a machine learning framework that leverages an autoencoder (AE) for the efficient modeling of FinFET.
By Amit Sarkar Suman Sau, Swagata Mandal
The paper introduces a physics‑informed graph attention network that directly operates on the tetrahedral mesh used in TCAD simulations of FinFET devices. By predicting electrostatic potential and quasi‑Fermi levels at every mesh node and training with both data loss and finite‑volume current‑continuity residuals, the surrogate retains the underlying carrier‑transport physics while achieving size generalization. Benchmarks against Sentaurus Device show sub‑volt RMSE for the drift‑diffusion fields and a per‑design throughput that is orders of magnitude faster, enabling rapid Pareto‑front exploration of large multi‑fin arrays that would otherwise be prohibitively slow to simulate.
By Leonid Popryho, Ayoub Sadeghi, Inna Partin-Vaisband
arXiv:2606. 04736v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have become a promising framework for simulating partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws directly into neural network training.
By Yingjie Shao, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis, George van Voorn, Taniya Kapoor
The paper introduces a linearized Physics-Informed Neural Network (lPINN), a reduced‑order neural basis approach for solving forward and inverse differential equations. In an offline phase, lPINN learns continuous, differentiable neural basis functions from numerical solutions, which are then frozen for new problem instances; the online solution is obtained by minimizing the governing‑equation residual with additional constraints. Experiments on advection‑diffusion, Burgers', and nonlinear pendulum equations show that lPINN achieves lower solution and parameter errors than vanilla PINNs while reducing online inference times by up to three orders of magnitude, and its continuous representation generalizes to finer meshes without retraining.
By Wenhao Chen, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2608. 11020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We systematically investigate finite-difference (FD) derivative computation in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as an alternative to automatic differentiation (AD).
By Maciej J. Mikulski, Tadeusz Uhl
We systematically investigate finite-difference (FD) derivative computation in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as an alternative to automatic differentiation (AD). On three benchmark PDEs we show that, with a properly calibrated step size, FD matches AD in accuracy on every problem while running faster across the full tested batch-size range and using substantially less GPU memory, and that a stochastic variant we propose outperforms AD on a stationary problem.
arXiv:2602. 06842v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning-based hybrid iterative methods (DL-HIMs) integrate classical numerical solvers with neural operators, utilizing their complementary spectral biases to accelerate convergence.
By Yuhan Wu, Jan Willem van Beek, Victorita Dolean, Alexander Heinlein
The paper proposes a method to amortize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) across related partial differential equations (PDEs) by explicitly modeling equation relationships in an operator graph. Coefficient vectors encode numerical parameters, while the graph hypernetwork generates diagonal codes that initialize a meta‑trained factorized PINN for each target equation. Experiments on scalar convection‑diffusion‑reaction, two‑field Fisher‑KPP, and a capacitively coupled plasma model show that term‑based descriptors and graph conditioning improve solution accuracy compared to coefficient‑vector conditioning alone.
The paper introduces a method to amortize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) across related partial differential equations (PDEs) by explicitly modeling equation relationships in an operator graph. Coefficient vectors encode numerical parameters, while the graph hypernetwork generates diagonal codes that initialize a meta‑trained factorized PINN for each target equation. Experiments on scalar convection‑diffusion‑reaction, two‑field Fisher‑KPP, and a capacitively coupled plasma model show that term‑based descriptors and graph conditioning improve solution accuracy compared to coefficient‑vector conditioning, especially for high‑reaction and coupled systems.
By Cheng Jing, Abhishek Verma, Kallol Bera, Yixuan He, Kookjin Lee
arXiv:2604. 07366v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) govern nearly every physical process in science and engineering, but solving them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.
By Yilong Dai, Shengyu Chen, Xiaowei Jia, Runlong Yu
arXiv:2609.00530v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recovering compact explicit solutions from neural approximations is challenging when imperfect teacher data guide symbolic topology search and coeffici...
By Pancheng Niu, Jun Guo, Qiaolin He, Jingcai Guo, Yanchao Shi