Physics-Informed Error Field Learning (PIEFL) is a post‑training optimization framework for Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). After a primary network reaches satisfactory accuracy, PIEFL introduces an auxiliary error network that learns the discrepancy between the current approximation and the exact solution by deriving error control equations under physical constraints. The learned error correction is then combined with the primary prediction, improving solution accuracy without modifying the primary network architecture and focusing computational resources on correcting existing prediction errors.
By Jiuyun Sun, Yong Zhang
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
The paper introduces PAM-GS, a physics-aware gradient surgery technique for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). It addresses the highly imbalanced multi-task optimisation problem in PINNs by adaptively mitigating task interference based on observed gradient conflicts. Experiments on four PDE benchmarks show that PAM-GS achieves competitive solution accuracy while maintaining strong task-balanced performance, outperforming existing methods on most problems.
By Thomas Borsani, Giuseppe Di Fatta
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
By Zhiwen Yu, Derong Yang, Liujian Zhang, Kaixiang Yang, Peilin Zhan, Jianmin Lv, Jane You, C. L. Philip Chen
arXiv:2607. 25608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding governing physical laws into deep neural networks.
By Pinki Khatun, M. Sajid, Abhinav Jha, M. Tanveer
arXiv:2601.12971v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can be limited by coordinate representations and conflicting gradients from heterogeneous physical constra...
By Pancheng Niu, Jun Guo, Qiaolin He, Yongming Chen, Yanchao Shi
Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning.
arXiv:2607. 02194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers.
By Joseph Webb, Sadok Jerad, Coralia Cartis
arXiv:2607. 18020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve PDEs by incorporating physical constraints into neural-network training, but large-scale problems are limited by automatic-differentiation memory overhead and inefficient execution of grid-based PDE operators.
By Peiyu Zang, Bosen Xie, Ruoxiang Xu, Yongqiang Cai
arXiv:2607. 18020v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve PDEs by incorporating physical constraints into neural-network training, but large-scale problems are limited by automatic-differentiation memory overhead and inefficient execution of grid-based PDE operators.
By Peiyu Zang, Bosen Xie, Ruoxiang Xu, Yongqiang Cai
arXiv:2607. 14233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have had a broad research impact in modeling domains governed by partial differential equations (PDE).
By Nilay Anurag, Shital Adhikari, Taniya Kapoor, Nikhil Muralidhar
The paper introduces the Physics-Informed Stochastic Configuration Machine (PI‑SCM), a backpropagation‑free neural network designed for solving nonlinear differential equations. By analytically evaluating local Jacobians, PI‑SCM linearizes the physical loss, enabling optimal weight determination through generalized linear least squares and avoiding iterative nonlinear optimization. The authors present a progressive algorithmic suite—PI‑SC‑I, PI‑SC‑II, and PI‑SC‑III—prove their universal approximation properties, and show through experiments that PI‑SCM achieves high‑fidelity predictions and parameter identification while accelerating training by orders of magnitude compared to standard PINNs.
By Yuehao Song (School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China), Zhong Chen (School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China), Lihui Cen (School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, China), Liang Wu (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA), Kai Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, China)