We systematically investigate finite-difference (FD) derivative computation in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as an alternative to automatic differentiation (AD). On three benchmark PDEs we show that, with a properly calibrated step size, FD matches AD in accuracy on every problem while running faster across the full tested batch-size range and using substantially less GPU memory, and that a stochastic variant we propose outperforms AD on a stationary problem.
arXiv:2608. 11020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We systematically investigate finite-difference (FD) derivative computation in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as an alternative to automatic differentiation (AD).
arXiv:2607. 13042v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper traces, with explicit numerical values, how PyTorch's automatic differentiation (AD) engine computes gradients for Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) training -- a setting that requires two levels of differentiation: computing the physics derivative $\hat{y}'(t)=d\hat{y}/dt$ through the network, and computing parameter gradients $\nabla_\theta L$ of a loss that itself depends on $\hat{y}'(t)$.
arXiv:2609.33078v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automatic differentiation (AD) lets neural networks compute derivatives of governing equations to machine precision, and this precision has made it...
arXiv:2609.13171v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) use automatic differentiation to impose differential-equation residuals, but good agreement in function values...
arXiv:2607. 18020v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve PDEs by incorporating physical constraints into neural-network training, but large-scale problems are limited by automatic-differentiation memory overhead and inefficient execution of grid-based PDE operators.
arXiv:2607. 18020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve PDEs by incorporating physical constraints into neural-network training, but large-scale problems are limited by automatic-differentiation memory overhead and inefficient execution of grid-based PDE operators.
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
arXiv:2606. 04736v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have become a promising framework for simulating partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws directly into neural network training.
arXiv:2607. 23940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve differential equations by minimizing the residual of a nonlinear operator over a neural parameterization of the solution.
arXiv:2609.23023v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) require coordinated choices over network representation, sampling, loss construction, and optimization, while...
arXiv:2602. 00884v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have shown promise in learning solution maps of partial differential equations (PDEs), but they often struggle to generalize when test inputs lie outside the training distribution, such as novel initial conditions, unseen PDE coefficients or unseen physics.
The paper introduces the Physics-Informed Stochastic Configuration Machine (PI‑SCM), a backpropagation‑free neural network designed for solving nonlinear differential equations. By analytically evaluating local Jacobians, PI‑SCM linearizes the physical loss, enabling optimal weight determination through generalized linear least squares and avoiding iterative nonlinear optimization. The authors present a progressive algorithmic suite—PI‑SC‑I, PI‑SC‑II, and PI‑SC‑III—prove their universal approximation properties, and show through experiments that PI‑SCM achieves high‑fidelity predictions and parameter identification while accelerating training by orders of magnitude compared to standard PINNs.