arXiv AI

API Benchmark Scores Do Not Reliably Transfer to Chatbot Interfaces

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

API Benchmark Scores Do Not Reliably Transfer to Chatbot Interfaces

The paper examines whether benchmark scores obtained via APIs accurately reflect the performance of AI chatbots when accessed through user interfaces. By auditing ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini across seven systems and nine benchmarks, the authors find that API evaluations consistently overestimate accuracy and consistency compared to interface evaluations, with differences comparable to downgrading a full model generation. Attempts to align API behavior with interface behavior through prompt and parameter adjustments only partially close the gap.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

ADeptS-Bench: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents Across Devices

ADeptS-Bench is a new benchmark designed to assess the trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents (CUAs) across mobile and desktop devices. It consists of two streams: a Safety stream with paired benign and malicious tasks that embed visual threats, and a Disambiguation stream that tests whether agents seek clarification when instructions are ambiguous. Evaluation of seven models shows none consistently achieves high task success while keeping attack success low, and all models exhibit problematic behaviors such as unhesitant checkout on a $25K order and failure to detect a mislabeled factory reset button.

By Joy Chen, Alejandro Castillejo Munoz, Pierluca D'Oro, Yuxuan Sun, Chloe Evans, Joseph Tighe
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models

arXiv:2606. 00566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As language models take on agentic roles that span calling external APIs, reading tool outputs, and acting on instructions embedded in third-party content, their attack surface expands well beyond what users type.

By Mohammed Sameer Syed (University of Arizona), Rozhin Yasaei (University of Arizona)
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Not to Break, but to Attest: Adversarial Probes for Privacy-Preserving LLM Verification

The paper introduces a privacy‑preserving zk‑SNARK audit framework that uses adversarial‑style probes to detect logit drift between an approved large language model and a modified deployment. It offers three probe families—token‑based (black‑box), embedding‑based (gray‑box), and stress probes (partial white‑box)—allowing users to balance sensitivity, access, and cost. Experiments across LLM architectures and GPU platforms show token‑based probes achieve the highest mean sensitivity while remaining practical in a black‑box setting, with Groth16 proving times scaling modestly from 1.02 to 1.78 seconds and constant proof size.

By Cameron Wilding, Mina Shaker, Fatemeh Ganji
arXiv AI
Jun 2

AgentRedBench: Dynamic Redteaming and Integration-Aware Defense for LLM Agents over SaaS Integrations

arXiv:2606. 02240v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Indirect prompt injection in tool-use agents is a concrete production threat: LLM agents read from integrations (third-party services such as Gmail, Salesforce, or Jira accessed through tool calls) whose response content the user neither writes nor controls.

By Hiskias Dingeto, Will Leeney
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

"If I Had to Buy Just ONE: Galaxy S26 Ultra": Auditing AI-Generated Product Recommendations

arXiv:2609.18729v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Consumers increasingly use AI chatbots for advice on what to buy. With companies like OpenAI and Google monetising their AI through advertising, this...

By Lucas G. Uberti-Bona Marin, Thales Bertaglia, Giovanni Astante, Bram Rijsbosch, Gijs van Dijck, Anik\'o Hann\'ak, Gerasimos Spanakis, Konrad Kollnig