arXiv AI
GameASG-Bench: Benchmarking Autonomous Software Generation for Game Development
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 21
GameLogicBench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Runtime Game Logic with Tick-Level State Assertions
arXiv:2609.21562v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents can modify and test code across large software projects. Game development is a domain where agents must implement gameplay rules. A gam...
arXiv AI
Oct 1
A2Z GameSpec-Bench: How Faithfully Can Coding Agents Generate Games from Game Design Specifications?
A2Z GameSpec-Bench introduces a benchmark of 100 long‑form Game Design Documents (GDDs) to evaluate how faithfully coding agents can generate complete games from detailed specifications. The benchmark measures faithfulness by checking that the game satisfies the GDD requirements and preserves the relationships among them, using a dependency‑aware contract and a combination of source‑code inspection and agent‑generated test policies. Evaluations show that current agents struggle to meet interdependent requirements, but requirement‑specific feedback improves GDD fidelity by 10.9% after two revision rounds.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21
RecreationWorld: Scalable and Verifiable Environments for Hybrid Computer-Use Agents
arXiv:2609.22000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents (CUAs) have advanced along two separate lines: graphical interaction and software development through code and the command line. Re...
arXiv AI
Oct 28
Benchmarking LLM Agents for Behaviorally Adequate Test Generation from Software Requirements
The paper introduces Req2Test-Bench, a benchmark of 5,086 instances linking natural‑language Gherkin requirements to developer‑written test implementations across five languages and four BDD frameworks. It evaluates eight agent–model–reasoning setups, finding that while the best configuration (Codex with DeepSeek‑V4.1‑Flash) produces passing tests for 82.8% of cases, only 33.8% are behaviorally adequate, as measured by kill‑completeness. The study highlights diminishing returns from scaling agents, the impact of under‑specified requirements, and the potential of requirement‑grounded harnesses to improve test generation.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
GameXpert-Bench: How Far Are Coding Agents from Expert Game Development?
arXiv:2608.21833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) can operate as coding agents that build complete games from natural language requests. Game development is especial...
arXiv AI
Oct 5
GUI Agents for Continual Game Generation
The paper introduces GUI agents for continual game generation, presenting PlaytestArena—a benchmark of 200 browser-based game-generation tasks with rubrics for in‑play behavior—and Play2Code, an iterative framework where a game agent and a rubric‑blind GUI playtester refine games through shared memory. Play2Code achieves a 66.8% rubric pass rate, surpassing baseline methods by 37.1 and 14.6 points, and shows consistent score improvement across refinement rounds. The study demonstrates that GUI playtesting provides actionable, traceable feedback that can guide interactive code generation.