Hugging Face Trending Papers

API Benchmark Scores Do Not Reliably Transfer to Chatbot Interfaces

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper examines whether benchmark scores obtained via APIs accurately reflect the performance of AI chatbots when accessed through user interfaces. By auditing ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini across seven systems and nine benchmarks, the authors find that API evaluations consistently overestimate accuracy and consistency compared to interface evaluations, with differences comparable to downgrading a full model generation. Attempts to align API behavior with interface behavior through prompt and parameter adjustments only partially close the gap.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

ADeptS-Bench: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents Across Devices

ADeptS-Bench is a new benchmark designed to assess the trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents (CUAs) across mobile and desktop devices. It consists of two streams: a Safety stream with paired benign and malicious tasks that embed visual threats, and a Disambiguation stream that tests whether agents seek clarification when instructions are ambiguous. Evaluation of seven models shows none consistently achieves high task success while keeping attack success low, and all models exhibit problematic behaviors such as unhesitant checkout on a $25K order and failure to detect a mislabeled factory reset button.

By Joy Chen, Alejandro Castillejo Munoz, Pierluca D'Oro, Yuxuan Sun, Chloe Evans, Joseph Tighe