CallScreenBench is a benchmark for evaluating small, on-device language models that act as phone secretaries, focusing on their ability to handle unknown inbound calls without a cooperative task. The benchmark measures owner endorsement through five call-and-note metrics, each paired with counter-metrics and uncertainty estimates, and includes guardedness diagnostics to identify safe, tool‑free proxies. Results across 4‑bit checkpoints of 0.6‑4 B parameter models show varying performance on service, recall, plausibility, and triage discrimination, highlighting trade‑offs between quality and guardedness.
arXiv:2607. 22635v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Target-oriented dialogue systems have demonstrated strong capabilities in completing user goals through interactive conversations.
arXiv:2607. 15367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Desktop voice assistants are still dominated by cloud pipelines that ship raw audio off the machine and expose a fixed set of skills.
BekchiAI introduces a benchmark and platform for evaluating large language model agents. The benchmark comprises 13 tool‑using ReAct agents across seven task categories, totaling 2,057 deterministic test tasks with verifier‑checkable gold answers. The platform offers web‑based observability, token and latency telemetry, and remote run termination for live agents.
The paper evaluates the use of large language models (LLMs) as judges for assessing conversational voice agents, comparing human judgments with GPT‑4.1 and GPT‑5 across telecom and retail interactions. It examines agreement, metric‑level correlations, and consistency across three evaluation configurations (p0, p1, p2) to determine how reliably LLMs can judge conversational quality and safety. The study finds that LLM‑based evaluation can be effective but its reliability varies by metric and configuration, suggesting a hybrid approach where LLMs handle scalable assessment while humans focus on metrics requiring contextual interpretation.
DuplexSpeechBench-IFEval (DSB-IFEval) is a new benchmark that evaluates how full‑duplex voice agents follow implicit instructions during real‑time spoken interaction. It contains 1,038 test cases across eight assistant roles and tests five conditioning protocols, measuring floor management with an Instruction Adherence Score (IAS) and persona consistency with a Persona Adherence Score (PAS). Experiments on six speech systems reveal architecture‑dependent trade‑offs, showing that some models are more sensitive to explicit versus persona‑only instructions and that even when following conflicting directives, they struggle to override them under safety conflict.
arXiv:2607. 19949v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Smartphone personal assistants reason over longitudinal personal data, yet evaluating them requires context-rich evaluation data whose correct answers are known, and real device traces are too privacy-sensitive to share.
arXiv:2609.13602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Voice agents often need to collect names, addresses, identifiers, dates, and times exactly, yet end-to-end benchmarks obscure where capture fails. We i...
arXiv:2608.30207v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computer use agents (CUAs) are vision-language models that perceive a screen and act on a real operating system through mouse, keyboard, and terminal...
The paper introduces llmovoice, a middleware that explicitly models voice context for large language model (LLM) serving in voice AI applications. By incorporating speaking rate, background noise, packet loss, and other paralinguistic factors into a bounded context, llmovoice guides the LLM to generate more aligned responses. Experiments show significant reductions in speaking‑rate errors, false interruptions, and model usage costs, especially in long voice sessions.
Scalable Context Orchestration for Serving LLMs Over Voice presents llmovoice, a middleware that explicitly models voice context—including speaking rate, background noise, and packet loss—to guide large language model responses. By constructing a bounded voice context at each turn, llmovoice improves alignment with user preferences and reduces errors, achieving a 52.4% drop in speaking‑rate alignment error and a 0.9% false‑interruption rate under packet loss. In addition, it cuts model usage costs dramatically, lowering per‑turn cost by up to 24.9× while maintaining 98.7% of baseline answer quality in long sessions.
ClawSentry is an open‑source, framework‑agnostic security supervision gateway designed to protect autonomous large language model (LLM) agents from progressive risks that can arise at four points in the agent control loop: skill admission, invocation‑time intent, execution‑time effect, and post‑action consequence. It introduces a multi‑tier decision engine—deterministic L1, rule‑anchored L2, and read‑only L3—alongside a First‑Use Skill Package Review (FSPR) and an Agent Harness Protocol (AHP) that applies a single policy across multiple agent runtimes without modifying their internals. Evaluation on SkillInject and the SkillsSafety benchmark shows that ClawSentry significantly reduces contextual adversarial skill risk (ASR) while maintaining high task success rates (TSR).
Computer use agents (CUAs) are vision-language models that perceive a screen and act on a real operating system through mouse, keyboard, and terminal, and they are increasingly deployed to automate ev...