arXiv AI

An Auditable Policy-Simulation Framework for Student Dropout in Intervention-Free Data

arXiv:2604. 08874v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study proposes a temporal modeling framework with a counterfactual policy-simulation layer for student dropout in higher education, using LMS engagement data and administrative withdrawal records.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Which CS1 Students Will Fail? Identifying Digital Markers from Learning Analytics in Computer Systems and Architecture Using Weighted Academic Momentum and Interaction Logs

The study explores whether combining traditional and digital learning analytics can predict failure in a first‑year CS1 course. Using data from 284 students across four cohorts, the authors identified ten candidate factors and built a logistic regression model that achieved 74.7% accuracy and 0.742 macro F1, with 87% recall for failing students. Weighted academic momentum, basic demographics, and LMS activity emerged as the most predictive features, suggesting that simple digital markers can enable early‑warning systems by week five.

By Lighton Phiri, Mutune Chaibela, Ivy Chisha, David Pungwa, Danny Siabbaba, Bydon Simukoko
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

OBER+: Continuity-Aware Reporting and Traceable Continuous Improvement in Outcome-Based Education

OBER+ extends an institutional attainment platform to bridge the gap between measured learning outcome shortfalls and corrective actions. It aggregates attainment across course deliveries, flags shortfalls, grades them against regulator cutoffs, records decisions linked to evidence‑annotated practices, logs changes, and quantifies subsequent improvements. The system also ensures outcomes are compared only when unchanged, preventing misleading comparisons across redefined outcomes, and has identified real defects in institutional data through rule‑based analysis.

By Elakkiya Rajasekar
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Participation-Sensitive Convergence and the Fragment First, Converge Later Pattern in Asynchronous Online Learning: A Topological Analysis Across 22 OULAD Courses

The study analyzes 22 OULAD asynchronous online courses (over 22,000 learners) using Zigzag Persistent Homology to track the number of disconnected behavioral clusters, denoted $eta_0$. It finds that changes in $eta_0$ strongly co‑vary with active learner counts, indicating that $eta_0$ is a participation‑sensitive indicator rather than a cause of dropout. Assessment deadlines trigger fragmentation in 82.6% of cases and the full Fragment First, Converge Later cycle in 60.2%, with long‑term fragmentation dominating 90.9% of courses.

By Hitoshi Inoue, Koichi Yasutake
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 22

When Are Scoring Rules Proper? Bridging Theory and Practice in Survival Model Evaluation

arXiv:2212. 05260v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Proper scoring rules encourage probabilistic predictions that match the true underlying distribution and are central to model evaluation, with increasing relevance in automated workflows such as AutoML.

By John Zobolas, Raphael Sonabend, Riccardo De Bin, Johannes Piller, Philipp Kopper, Lukas Burk, Andreas Bender
arXiv AI
Aug 28

EduRiskX: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework with F-Logic Reasoning for Early Academic Risk Prediction

EduRiskX is a neuro-symbolic framework that combines a temporal Transformer-based predictor with an F-Logic symbolic reasoning module to forecast students’ academic risk early in online courses. The neural part models longitudinal activity sequences, while the F-Logic rule base, grounded in Engagement Theory and the Student Integration Model, offers interpretable, rule-based explanations. On the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset, EduRiskX achieves an accuracy of 0.900 and an F1-score of 0.894 by week 38, detecting risk on average by week 9.32 with a 94.30% detection rate, outperforming state‑of‑the‑art time‑series and deep learning baselines.

By Yu Fu, Yongqi Kang, Yong Zhao, Rongfang Bie