The paper introduces the concept of intervention fidelity in latent world models, measuring whether a model’s open‑loop transitions align with actual environment interventions. Experiments on TD‑MPC2, Cheetah, and DreamerV3 show that high reward fit does not guarantee fidelity, and that self‑supervised models can outperform task‑anchored ones in preserving intervention effects. The authors propose a capture‑gated audit to localize failures and argue that fidelity must be directly audited on the model’s native interface.
By Donna Vakalis
The paper introduces Dual-Frontier, a learning principle that determines when an agent should trust its world model for decision-making. It formalizes the failure-attribution problem as a counterfactual decomposition of return loss and shows that its components cannot be identified from passive interaction, even for finite-horizon planners. Dual-Frontier allows a model‑guided decision only when the predicted advantage exceeds a certified bound on decision‑relevant world‑model error; otherwise, the agent focuses on verifying the model. The authors provide theoretical guarantees, adaptive evidence reuse, and experimental validation on controlled and realistic benchmarks, demonstrating improved decision quality and reliability.
By Huatai Zhu, Qiang Chen, Ziqian Kou, Wenhao Li, Fei Wang, Yichao Cao, Xiu Su, Yi Chen
arXiv:2607. 00871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving agents violate the assumption behind most learning-theoretic guarantees: the data, evaluator, components, and hypothesis space are produced by the policy being updated.
By Biswa Sengupta
arXiv:2606. 08275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When an LLM agent fails -- issues a refund it should not have, calls the wrong tool, leaks data -- existing tooling answers what happened (observability) or whether it passed (evaluation), but not which step caused the failure.
By Jaineet Shah
arXiv:2607. 10362v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent world models are trained to predict future states in a learned representation and are then deployed inside a planner that selects actions by simulating them forward.
By Hanzhe You, Yonggang Zhang, Maohao Ran, Zhiqin Yang, Zhenyuan Zhang, Wei Xue, Jun Song, Xinmei Tian, Yike Guo
arXiv:2511. 02748v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We argue that sixth-generation (6G) intelligence is not fluent token prediction but the capacity to imagine and choose -- to simulate future scenarios, weigh trade-offs, and act with calibrated uncertainty.
By Farhad Rezazadeh, Amir Ashtari Gargari, Hatim Chergui, Sandra Lagen, Merouane Debbah, Houbing Song, Lingjia Liu
arXiv:2607. 05238v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: JEPA world models predict the next latent state with a single deterministic predictor trained by latent regression.
By Zhi Song, Ximing Xing, Zhenchao Tang, hanbo Huang, Tianxu Lv, minghao Yang, Zhongzheng Niu, He Bing, Lusheng Wang, Jianhua Yao
arXiv:2607. 01736v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how to predict the downstream closed-loop performance of a learned latent world model from validation-time diagnostics alone.
By Nikolai Smolyanskiy
arXiv:2607. 14826v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe physical AI for robot actions are required not only likely to succeed but tested to be safe before execution.
By Naren Vasantakumaar, Tom Schierenbeck, Michael Beetz
The paper introduces LP‑BTS, a learning‑guided planning framework for mobile charging in large, dynamic action spaces. It uses a graph proposal policy to narrow candidate stops, a value critic to evaluate leaf nodes, and edge‑budgeted PUCT to compare short simulated futures before action selection. Experiments on a 30‑scenario battery‑life benchmark show LP‑BTS achieving the highest survival and alive‑AUC, outperforming domain‑engineered baselines and heuristic policies.
By Liang-Ching Tao, Pi-Chung Wang
The paper introduces the concept of causal retention in interactive agents, examining whether a frozen learned state can correctly answer a mechanism‑probe map that is fixed independently of training. It shows that for finite structural causal models the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk, vanishing only when each learning‑interface fiber lies within a single probe‑answer fiber, and provides theoretical results such as a posterior‑coverage theorem and an exact edit decomposition. Experiments on finite causal systems, continuous simulators, TD‑MPC2, and Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct demonstrate that causal retention can be achieved with high accuracy, outperforming task‑performance‑based approaches.
By Shengjun Zhang, Tingyi Liu, Dong Xie, Yunlong Dong, Xiang Wang, Cheng Zeng
arXiv:2606. 03238v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) makes large-scale post-training possible by replacing an underspecified human objective with learned and scalable proxies.
By Zelalem Abahana