arXiv Computer Vision

If It Moves, Radar Knows: A Physics-Aware Radar Transformer for Class-Agnostic Moving-Object Detection

The paper introduces the Physics-Aware Radar Transformer (PART), a radar-only detector that predicts moving-object existence, surface points, and ground-plane velocity using Doppler-aware query initialization and physics-guided cross-attention. PART achieves high class-agnostic performance on the nuScenes dataset, excelling in rare categories and adverse conditions such as night, rain, and occlusion. The model is lightweight, with only 1.1 million parameters, and its code and pretrained weights will be released publicly.

arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

RLG-TPV: Radar- and LiDAR-Guided Tri-Perspective View Fusion for Camera-Radar 3D Object Detection

RLG-TPV introduces a multimodal Tri-Perspective View framework that fuses camera, radar, and training‑time LiDAR data for 3D object detection. It uses radar and LiDAR to guide a ray‑deformable attention lift, refining depth distributions and providing geometric supervision for side and front planes, while radar cross‑section awareness spreads evidence spatially. On nuScenes, the method attains 0.4981 mAP and 0.5959 NDS, improving orientation and velocity accuracy by about 32 % and 31 % over the CRN baseline.

By Ahmet Mete Dokgoz, A. Enes Doruk, Hasan F. Ates
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30

RadarTwin: Scene-Specific mmWave Radar Simulation and Learning for Mobile Indoor Perception

arXiv:2606. 28396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar perception is limited by data scarcity: models trained on existing radar datasets fail to generalize to new objects, environments, and sensing trajectories.

By Emily Bejerano, Federico Tondolo, Devang Gupta, Aaron Mano Cherian, Taeyoo Kim, Ayaan Qayyum, Xiaofan Yu, Xiaofan Jiang
arXiv AI
Aug 19

Comparative Study of Out-of-the-Box Technology for Automatic Target Detection and Recognition

The paper evaluates out‑of‑the‑box object detection models for automatic target detection and recognition (ATD/R) in military settings. Six YOLO variants and two DETR variants were benchmarked on a new military dataset featuring vehicles, occlusions, and small targets, with performance measured in mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 across air‑to‑ground and ground‑to‑ground perspectives. Findings show larger models and DETR-based approaches perform best, fine‑tuning on the VisDrone dataset improves air‑to‑ground and small‑object performance, yet all models still struggle with small targets in air‑to‑ground scenarios.

By Alma M. Liezenga, Lotte Nijskens, Henrik R. Baumann, Stefan Becker, Simon Bensberg, Niccol\`o Camarlinghi, H{\aa}vard R. Eiring, Alexander W. Johnsgaard, Tanel Liiv, Giuseppe Martino, Matteo Marturini, Matthias Rapp, Jan Erik van Woerden, Alexander Wolpert, Hugo J. Kuijf