arXiv:2606. 11190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-modal alignment (CA) and cross-modal prediction (CP) are the dominant paradigms for multimodal representation learning, yet there is no systematic understanding of when each succeeds, when each fails, and when cross-modal training helps at all -- a gap that leaves practitioners, especially in scientific domains like biomedicine or astrophysics, with heterogeneous instruments and multiple levels of organization and measurement, unable to diagnose why standard methods underperform the best single modality.
By Ilay Kamai, Hugues Van Assel, Aviv Regev, Hagai B. Perets, Randall Balestriero
Cross-modal alignment (CA) and cross-modal prediction (CP) are the dominant paradigms for multimodal representation learning, yet there is no systematic understanding of when each succeeds, when each fails, and when cross-modal training helps at all -- a gap that leaves practitioners, especially in scientific domains like biomedicine or astrophysics, with heterogeneous instruments and multiple levels of organization and measurement, unable to diagnose why standard methods underperform the best single modality. We develop a unified linear framework that addresses both questions.
arXiv:2606. 15743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses the missing-modality challenge in multi-modal learning by introducing Unsupervised Learning for Missing Modalities in Multi-Modal Learning (UL4M4), a flexible framework that imputes missing feature embeddings in a task-independent manner before supervised prediction.
By Hassan Ismkhan, Hamid Bouchahcia
arXiv:2606. 00327v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clustering is widely used across the sciences as the foundation for downstream data-driven scientific discoveries.
By Kai R. Wycik, Tiffany M. Tang, Tarek M. Zikry, Genevera I. Allen
arXiv:2606. 05230v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Selecting a clustering algorithm and its hyperparameters without labels is a common difficulty in engineering machine learning pipelines that work with unsupervised analysis of sensor, image, or process data.
By Mahdi Shamsi, Soosan Beheshti
arXiv:2608. 07795v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prediction intervals for multi-modal regression with tabular variables, text, images, or other input sources are difficult to calibrate when those sources disagree or one is missing.
By Ilia Azizi
arXiv:2512. 02076v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose FDRMFL, a task-driven multimodal feature extraction framework for federated regression under non-IID data distributions.
By Haozhe Wu
arXiv:2509. 25289v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Identifying an effective clustering algorithm for a given dataset remains a fundamental unsupervised learning issue.
By Mohammadreza Bakhtyari, Bogdan Mazoure, Renato Cordeiro de Amorim, Guillaume Rabusseau, Vladimir Makarenkov
The paper proposes an ensemble method for clusterwise regression that uses exact solutions on many small random subsamples. Each subsample is solved to global optimality, extended to the full data via nearest-surface assignment, and the resulting partitions are combined by voting or selection. The method achieves high accuracy even with up to 20% gross outliers and can estimate the trimming level without prior knowledge, outperforming traditional trimmed alternation in worst‑case scenarios.
By Samir Orujov
The paper introduces a framework to tackle modality imbalance in multimodal learning by focusing on sample-level variations. It defines a Modality Gap metric to measure prediction discrepancies, models the resulting bimodal distribution with a Gaussian Mixture Model, and uses Bayesian probabilities for soft separation of balanced and imbalanced samples. A two‑stage training process—Warm‑up and Adaptive Training—reallocates loss weights based on the GMM, strengthening alignment for imbalanced samples while favoring fusion for balanced ones, and shows superior performance over existing baselines.
By Zhiwen Yu, Zhaocheng Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Huanqiang Zeng, C. L. Philip Chen
arXiv:2607. 06887v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most self-supervised image clustering models, actually almost all deep learning approaches, are based on gradient descent: In order to calculate the loss, every optimization step requires a clearly defined target, whether a contrastive split, a masked patch or entity, an EMA-teacher output, a pseudo-label, or a differentiable information-theoretic functional.
By Canlin Zhang, Xiuwen Liu
arXiv:2609.39464v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In federated averaging, local objectives can admit multiple optimal heads, making the aggregate depend on which heads clients return. We study this amb...
By Chuang Ma, Tomoyuki Obuchi