arXiv AI

SalesLoop: Reinforcement Learning from Performance Feedback for Sales Lead Ranking

arXiv:2607. 20655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lead ranking in Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems faces a persistent challenge: models achieving high offline accuracy often underperform in production.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Sell More, Play Less: Benchmarking LLM Realistic Selling Skill

The paper introduces SalesLLM, a bilingual (Chinese/English) benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in realistic sales dialogues. It comprises 30,074 scripted configurations and 1,805 curated multi‑turn scenarios from Financial Services and Consumer Goods, with controllable difficulty and personas. An automatic evaluation pipeline uses an LLM judge for sales‑process progress and fine‑tuned BERT classifiers for end‑of‑dialogue buying intent, while a user model, CustomerLM, is trained to improve simulation fidelity. SalesLLM scores correlate strongly with human ratings (Pearson r = 0.86) and reveal that top Chinese LLMs match junior‑to‑intermediate human salespeople but not experts, with cross‑lingual consistency remaining poor.

By Xuanbo Su, Wenhao Hu, Le Zhan, Yuting Xie, Kailin Lyu, Kaijie Chen, Ziwei Li, Yeqiang Wang, Haibo Su, Yunzhang Chen, Ling Huang
arXiv AI
Jun 26

AIGP: An LLM-Based Framework for Long-Term Value Alignment in E-Commerce Pricing

arXiv:2606. 26787v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traditional dynamic pricing models in large-scale e-commerce suffer from limited interpretability, poor utilization of unstructured information, and misalignment with long-term business objectives such as cumulative Gross Merchandise Value (GMV), Return on Investment (ROI) and milestone achievement.

By Chennan Ma, Yanning Zhang, Siqi Hong, Xiuchong Wang, Fei Xiao, Keping Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 13

When Offline Evaluation Misleads: A Diagnostic Protocol for Reward and Policy Selection in Delayed-Feedback Contextual Bandits

arXiv:2608. 11560v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalizing marketing messages with contextual multi-armed bandits (CMABs) drives real business value, yet the objective that ultimately matters - a downstream conversion - is observed only weeks later, too late to drive online learning.

By Sang Su Lee, Vineeth Loganathan, Shishir Dash, Vijay Raghavan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

When Offline Evaluation Misleads: A Diagnostic Protocol for Reward and Policy Selection in Delayed-Feedback Contextual Bandits

Personalizing marketing messages with contextual multi-armed bandits (CMABs) drives real business value, yet the objective that ultimately matters - a downstream conversion - is observed only weeks later, too late to drive online learning. Teams therefore train the bandit on a fast proxy reward, and separately must judge whether a contextual bandit is worth its complexity over sending one best message.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

EvoRank: LLM-Guided Evolution of Multi-Objective Learning-to-Rank Pipelines

EvoRank is an open autonomous ranking engineer that uses an LLM-guided evolutionary loop to automatically design complete Learning-to-Rank pipelines—including features, models, losses, and ensembles—for multi-objective e-commerce search. On the Expedia ICDM 2013 dataset, EvoRank converged within 50 iterations on interpretable pipelines that outperform an Optuna-tuned LambdaMART on 60k held-out queries and rank in the top 6 % of the original competition. The authors also introduce a headroom gate that predicts whether the evolutionary loop will be worthwhile before any LLM computation, and they release the system, auditing tools, and a catalog of failure modes to help teams apply the method to their own ranking stacks.

By Rayhan Patel, Shabaz Patel
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Evaluation Choices Decide the Forecasting Leaderboard: Evidence from a Production Marketplace Panel

The paper demonstrates that the outcome of a forecasting leaderboard is largely determined by the evaluator’s design choices rather than the models themselves. By fixing the data, horizon, and period, the authors varied three key evaluation decisions—unit of analysis, error pooling, and scoring metric—and showed that each can reverse or eliminate the apparent superiority of any forecasting method. The study also evaluates the practical impact of these choices on a deployed system, revealing that the selection rule captures a significant portion of the potential performance gain, and confirms the findings on an external public dataset.

By Md Rezwanul Islam, Wael Mohammed
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Discriminative World Models for Web Agents

The paper introduces Discriminative World Models for Web Agents, proposing a predicted-state matching objective that trains world models to produce representations that can distinguish the true resulting state from those of alternative actions. Using a branching dataset from WebArena Go-Browse, the authors demonstrate that this approach outperforms traditional supervised next-state prediction on a held‑out benchmark and improves action ranking on WebPRMBench. Additionally, employing the discriminative world model for test‑time action selection boosts end‑to‑end task success on WebArena‑Lite.

By Kelvin Li, Dhruv Pendharkar, Anish Pahilajani, Chuyi Shang, Leon Oks, Leonid Karlinsky, Rogerio Feris, Trevor Darrell, Roei Herzig